Suzy ft miss A for Roem.
2013-02-01 02:48 am






» roem romantic@youtube » romantic roem » songjoinz@tumblr
before people start bitch about the title and the lack of pictures of the remaining three members, this endorsement is mostly suzy, as she is the main model for the brand, miss a (sadly) is only featuring in it. also this is a really big endorsement, the previously main model for the brand was song hye kyo and she was with them from 2006 to 2012. and with all that said, i want every single one of these clothes.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 04:53 am (UTC)http://i45.tinypic.com/2qbdcgg.jpg cute
no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 04:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 05:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 06:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 06:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 05:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 05:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 05:25 am (UTC)I have never found Suzy really attractive. She has never stood out me. Like...the close up is really bad?
But whatevs get dat money gurl~
no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 05:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 05:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 05:30 am (UTC)i want the dresses min and suzy wear in the third photo.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 05:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 05:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 05:43 am (UTC)Suzy completely fits with this image- tres adorbs
no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 05:55 am (UTC)JYP could try and manage for the group to use Suzy's popularity to their favor instead of against them.
and ngl, also possibly a bit mad at the girls for passively accepting all of this (if it's even possible for them to say anything at all).
no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 06:32 am (UTC)i doubt they are doing that, because they would get more money with the four of them being active, this is just poor management. think in the positive side, at least this time they got something, maybe this is a sigh that the things are changing.
and jype is pretty open when it comes to complain about things, they tend to listen their idols, but honestly? as much i think this sometimes can be tiring for the girls, and they would wish to get more spot light, they seem very found of the extra time they got, especially when it comes to traveling to see their families and etc.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 06:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 06:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 05:58 am (UTC)This looks so matronly T_T
The Min/Suzy shot in the pink outfit is cute though.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 06:01 am (UTC)Aside from that unf I love girls in blazers and the pics are nice but something is off. I think it's the colours?
no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 06:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 06:35 am (UTC)reason why in many endorsements/cfs people go "needs more *!!
no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 06:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 06:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 07:02 am (UTC)this is exactly what i'm trying to say though. they have made it incredibly incredibly obvious that they want suzy by herself more so than the entire group. why else would they release a batch of photos that have pictures of either suzy alone or suzy and another member?
and really? name one, because i seriously cannot think of an snsd example that's similar to this.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 07:11 am (UTC)dude, you are really going to make me search? soshi's cfs especially during the gee/genie era, certain members, mostly hyoyeon, sooyoung and sunny, always were in the back as backdrops and etc.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 07:23 am (UTC)Well you seemed like you had an exact cf in mind when you said that :/ but yes I agree, those three were often in the back, hell it's basically still true now. The difference I'm trying to establish is that certain girls weren't clearly SAID as being the main model like this cf now.
What I'm trying to say is if Yoona's future innisfree cfs starting including the other members, then the case would be the same as this.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 07:28 am (UTC)i do remember a cf, but i cannot remember the product, hence me saying the era because i remember yoona's hair, as she was the center of the cf in most of times, along with taeyeon and i believe someone else, and the other members would just be in the back, looking pretty.
also this happens to other groups, for example, after school was signed to the saem, but uee was the main model and she was the one with most pictures, as well landrover, after school also has the gig as a group, but uee is a main model, and has more pictures then them, as well being the one in the cfs. the list of groups can go on and on.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 07:37 am (UTC)Lol Yoona is the centre alllllll the time. Her short hair right? Maybe it was the hair curler one or whatever that thing was.
Not even surprised with uee/after school. The popularity differences are just insane. I don't pay much attention to other groups so I really wouldn't know. Thanks for the examples though! :D
no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 07:53 am (UTC)lol i know, but that cf made an impression in me because i swear four of the girls stood there, just smiling XD.
and yeah, there were a few other groups as well, but i cannot remember who, as i don't really care about them XD
no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 06:03 am (UTC)jia, min and fei look lovely. i'm glad that they weren't styled to make suzy standout.
is peplum out? i would think that peplum would be all over these designs.
i really like that scenic wallpaper of a park.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 07:49 am (UTC)It makes sense that she's the main model cuz she matches the brand well.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 08:35 am (UTC)though in one picture, suzy looks like iu. or is it just me?
no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 08:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 09:57 am (UTC)the clothes are not really my style but they all look cute, at least.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 10:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 11:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 02:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-02 03:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 03:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 04:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 08:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-01 11:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-02 03:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-02 06:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-02 08:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-03 03:59 am (UTC)