![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
swhyeon1991.livejournal.com posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
omonatheydid
BtoB is making their comeback with their second mini album, ‘Press Play‘!
The group is scheduled to reveal their album along with their title track, “Wow“, on September 12th, and ahead of the release, a teaser image has been released through various social media sites.
The pop art teaser image containing the lower portion of a BtoB member’s face and the “Wow” formed by the hands and the mouth, is all said to be the members’ own idea.
“Wow” is said to be of “new jack swing” style, which was popular during the ’90s, and incorporates the solid vocal and rap skills of the members.
The comeback was hinted at earlier through the photo of Sungjae and the stars of ’90s based sitcom, ‘Reply 1997‘, Seo In Guk and A Pink‘s Eunji (article below), as the latter two mimicked the pose seen in the teaser image.
BtoB‘s Sungjae recently updated fans with a friendly snapshot with ‘Respond 1997‘ stars Seo In Guk and A Pink‘s Eunji.
A snapshot of Sungjae and the ‘Respond 1997′ stars was released on the 4th, drawing much attention from the fans of the three singers.
Fans were surprised by Sungjae’s meeting with the sitcom stars, and also remarked on how much Sungjae and Seo In Guk look alike being that as the two are widely known as doppelgangers of each other. Netizens also picked up on how Seo In Guk and Eunji are putting three fingers in the air while Sungjae does the typical V sign, leaving them curious as to whether there may be a meaning behind the poses.
ㅡㅡㅡWhy BtoB’s Yook Sung Jae turned up at the set of tvN’s Reply 1997 has fans boggled at all the possibilities.
On September 4, a new tweet was posted on BtoB’s official Twitter saying, “Reply melody,” and “WOW.”
Two photos were included, one with Yook Sung Jae with A Pink’s Jung Eun Ji , who plays Sung Si Won in the drama.
The second showed Yook Sung Jae posing with both Jung Eun Ji and Seo In Guk (Yoon Yoon Jae in the drama), who were making ‘Wow’ signs with their fingers and mouths, promoting BtoB in its upcoming endeavors, which will be revealed on September 12.
But with Yook Sung Jae wearing a school uniform and known for being the doppelganger of Seo In Guk, it is being speculated that he will be making a cameo appearance for the drama, perhaps as Jung Eun Ji and Seo In Guk’s son.
Upon seeing the photos, netizens asked, “Is Yook Sung Jae Seo In Guk’s son?” “Does this mean that Yoon Jae marries Si Won?” and “Father and son?”
Sources:
Articles: allkpop [1] [2] | enewsworld
Pics: @OFFICIALBTOB [1] [2]
Umm ok the teaser looks weird ;__;
ETA: Reply 1997 spoiler warning included! But well it's just ~speculation~ tho
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2012-09-04 05:32 pm (UTC)why is sungjae dressed so formally? and that is him on the cover, right?
no subject
Date: 2012-09-04 05:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-09-04 05:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-09-04 06:13 pm (UTC)Now it's time for me to marathon Answer Me 1997, though omona and allkpop spoiled it for me sooo much ;~;
no subject
Date: 2012-09-04 06:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-09-04 06:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-09-04 06:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-09-04 06:50 pm (UTC)New Jack Swing? This may just get me to like BTOB.
no subject
Date: 2012-09-04 07:09 pm (UTC)came in here to see pics, get a drama spoiler. T_T
no subject
Date: 2012-09-04 11:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-09-05 05:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-09-05 04:47 am (UTC)But hey it's just speculation rite~ XD
no subject
Date: 2012-09-04 10:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-09-04 10:47 pm (UTC)I only really liked Monday to Sunday from their first album so I hope they have better songs this time. Anything less would be a waste of their talents (idk about Peniel, he doesn't get to do anything). Insane wasn't bad but kinda meh compared to Irresistible Lips.
no subject
Date: 2012-09-05 04:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-09-05 05:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-09-05 04:52 am (UTC)