Arrest warrant for Ko is rejected
2012-05-25 10:42 amAfter spending most of Wednesday being interrogated, an arrest warrant for entertainer Ko Young-wook was rejected.
“We have insufficient evidence on the matter to issue an arrest warrant,” the Seoul Western District Prosecutors’ Office said.
Ko was allowed to go home while police continue to investigate the sexual assault charges brought against him by three minors.
As he was leaving the police station on Wednesday night, Ko said he was sorry for “causing a disturbance,” and vowed that he would continue to cooperate with the police.
The first accusation against the ’90s dance group member was brought by a teenager and aspiring entertainer in March who claimed that the singer raped her after he suggested meeting up in order to talk about launching her career.
Since then, two other girls have also stepped forward to file similar complaints against the Korean entertainer.
source: korea joongang daily
no subject
Date: 2012-05-25 03:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-25 03:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-25 04:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-25 05:10 pm (UTC)So basically he didn't deny that something happened, but he never admitted he did anything specific.
no subject
Date: 2012-05-25 05:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-25 04:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-26 06:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-25 05:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-25 06:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-25 08:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-25 10:49 pm (UTC)(I mean, if it were the US and they arrested him, he'd just be out again on bail. It's not like he's going to just go out and rape someone and the only way to stop him is to put him behind bars so he can't, so....)
no subject
Date: 2012-05-25 11:44 pm (UTC)so ya no i dont think its proceeding
no subject
Date: 2012-05-25 11:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-26 12:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-05-26 12:37 am (UTC)It looks like proving rape in the case of non-underaged (?) victims has a really high bar in SK, from what I read re: the OWE scandal, that I doubt they will be able to make a case of rape-rape against this guy (especially if the first girl met up with him again after he already raped her?) I have to wonder how seriously SK takes statutory rape, though. (Although, my issue is not with the "having sex with a minor in her late teens" so much as "coercing someone to have sex with you"... also, given the copypasta here (http://omonatheydidnt.livejournal.com/9167524.html?thread=980032932#t980032932), if the age-19 law is actually aimed at sexual trafficking rather than a situation like this, is it the age-13 limit that actually applies? >.>)
(Please don't think I'm making apologies for him; I just was thinking that even if we assume the police are scumbags, it doesn't seem like the laws as they are make it particularly easy for them to operate.)
no subject
Date: 2012-05-26 12:51 am (UTC)(Although, it makes me wonder how they arrested the OWE CEO, if all the evidence then were also (?) verbal testimonies by the victims?)
no subject
Date: 2012-05-26 12:55 am (UTC)