[identity profile] gyuri.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] omonatheydid


A Japanese magazine recently took a close-up of the inside of Goo Hara’s skirt and used it as their cover picture. As a result, DSP Media is looking into what legal options it may take against the magazine.

On May 14, Goo’s agency, DSP Media, said, "The magazine is a popular Japanese adult magazine and they took a picture of the inside of Goo’s skirt. They report on celebrities and maliciously release edited and suggestive pictures of them."

"We are currently checking how the magazine reports did on our entertainers and we are also considering taking legal action against the magazine, with Japanese DSP Media and Universal Music."

The picture was taken when Goo attended the ’2011 Best Dressed Awards,’ which was held in November in Japan.

enkoea

Date: 2012-05-14 05:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] martha-sal.livejournal.com
that's an awkward picture of Hara...
am glad that DSP are going to do something about it though...

Date: 2012-05-14 05:57 pm (UTC)
ext_155850: (Default)
From: [identity profile] kazu-kumaguro.livejournal.com
lmao
just try

Date: 2012-05-14 06:02 pm (UTC)
ext_155850: (Default)
From: [identity profile] kazu-kumaguro.livejournal.com
I want to see if they can win this though, this magazine is actually very disturbing.

Date: 2012-05-14 06:04 pm (UTC)
ext_155850: (Default)
From: [identity profile] kazu-kumaguro.livejournal.com
but it's like suing a magazine to take an unflattering picture.
and the photo is taken from a formal event.

Date: 2012-05-14 06:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mookowzmoo.livejournal.com
slander is telling false stories or accusations. not panty shots.

Date: 2012-05-14 06:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ryousan26.livejournal.com
OMG Don't mind my reply. That was supposed to be a new comment. lol

Date: 2012-05-14 06:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dbsked.livejournal.com
but such things should be illegal.

Date: 2012-05-14 06:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hinadori.livejournal.com
It should be its not. I felt horrible for Emma Watson when she turned 18. Like on the day the paps tried taking up skirt shots of her.

Date: 2012-05-14 08:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] smilez4you.livejournal.com
smh that is vile >:/

Date: 2012-05-14 06:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] asnindie.livejournal.com
Not sure you can sue them but I'm glad DSP are trying.

Date: 2012-05-14 07:29 pm (UTC)

Date: 2012-05-14 09:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] liferule91.livejournal.com
it's a porn magazine though not a gossip one. Porn magazine need consent on some level from the person of interest

Date: 2012-05-15 01:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sandra-hall.livejournal.com
didn't nothing happen over the 'boa course' thing though

Date: 2012-05-14 06:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tha-x.livejournal.com
Good luck

Date: 2012-05-14 06:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] uledy.livejournal.com
I'm not sure on what legal ground they have to sue, but this should be interesting. I haven't any idea on how invasive the zoomed-in shot is (I dare not look at on my work computer), is it really bad? Can you actually see anything?

Date: 2012-05-14 06:25 pm (UTC)
ext_155850: (Default)
From: [identity profile] kazu-kumaguro.livejournal.com
I don't think you can actually see anything, I bet it's just her thigh (like their 829739120 other panties shots)

Date: 2012-05-14 06:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] asnindie.livejournal.com
I was like how gay am I that I couldn't tell if there was any lady parts there. I don't think there's anything there, but they've blurred it to make it look like there is and it's not right.

Date: 2012-05-14 06:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] burger.livejournal.com
It's just the side of her thigh really, but zooming in and blurring it like a porn movie makes it look suspicious.
Edited Date: 2012-05-14 06:49 pm (UTC)

Date: 2012-05-14 07:11 pm (UTC)
ext_155850: (Default)
From: [identity profile] kazu-kumaguro.livejournal.com
the thing is, the magazine isn't the one who blurred the photo.

Date: 2012-05-15 12:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cultic.livejournal.com
it was zoomed in w/o blur in the magazine, and it was quite obviously just her thighs touching... really reaching & still creepy but

Date: 2012-05-14 07:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cc9095.livejournal.com
So it was a porn magazine? XD

Date: 2012-05-14 07:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] annhh.livejournal.com
as they should. I don't think simply warning them is enough. I mean, it was the cover. imo they should quit that magazine even
(deleted comment)

Date: 2012-05-14 11:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] annhh.livejournal.com
I'm afraid I can't catch your point

Date: 2012-05-14 08:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] smilez4you.livejournal.com
we'll see how this turns out..

Date: 2012-05-14 09:37 pm (UTC)

Date: 2012-05-14 10:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miki-831.livejournal.com
Do they actually have grounds to sue them? You can't even see anything in the picture but her thigh.

Date: 2012-05-15 01:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-perfect-shade.livejournal.com
so where's da pic

Date: 2012-05-15 02:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] secretchord.livejournal.com
I think that picture is insinuating she has a (rather impressive) dong rather than implying she was revealing any lady parts. The placement is all wrong.

I am over-thinking this.

Date: 2012-05-15 02:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] a-perfect-shade.livejournal.com
if her thighs weren't wasting away there wouldn't be such a controversial fold in the first place
dis is all ur fault dsp for starving my bb

Date: 2012-05-15 02:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] toshi830.livejournal.com
I'm beginning to think it's not even that bad really, just exaggerated with the pixels

Date: 2012-05-15 04:02 am (UTC)
ext_80893: by rykea (Default)
From: [identity profile] ghostdrive.livejournal.com
Whatever you do, don't go to this article up on Arama, it is a trainwreck. There are some total shitty comments there. :\

Date: 2012-05-15 06:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bumie.livejournal.com
I just came from there and I shouldn't read the comments , they were so painful

Date: 2012-05-15 05:54 am (UTC)

Date: 2012-05-15 11:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ninomiy4r4shi.livejournal.com
They better apologize for this. I can't even, using your picture for a porn magazine.

Profile

omonatheydid: (Default)
omonatheymoved

March 2022

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 2026-03-03 04:47 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios