Online war on East Sea – Japanese netizens argue that East Sea was originally a Japanese territory

Korea and Japan have been on a battle on the petition board [We the People] of the White House website regarding the issue of naming the East Sea, on the 21st of April. The battle has sparked criticism from Japanese netizens against the marking of East Sea, which has since spread rapidly online.
There is a continuous stream of posts on the website 2ch (www.2ch.net) reproaching the petition from Korea to mark the Sea as the East Sea. This website is an anonymous online community with the largest number of simultaneous log-ins in the world.
A Japanese netizen claimed that ‘it is dogmatic of Korea to mark the sea as East Sea, as nowhere else in the East Asia – including Japan, Taiwan and China – refer to it as the East Sea.’
Another netizen rolled out some raw insults, saying that Korea has little influence on the international community, and the East Sea would have been called the Pacific Ocean if Japan didn’t exist.
There were also posts against the name East Sea that instead suggested using the name ‘Gyeong-Hae’, one of the archaic names for the East Sea.
The writer explained that Gyeong-Hae would be suitable, because Japan can accept it as an old name and Korea could approve it since the name doesn’t include the word ‘Japan.’
Japanese netizens are generating a similar stream of criticism on SNS in the country.
A picture file explaining how to sign up on the petition opposing East Sea mark is spreading rapidly on Twitter, and the message encouraging participation in the petition is getting retweeted constantly.
‘Koreans argue that they have called it East Sea since before Christ, but I don’t think they could have grasped the shape of Sea of Japan. Even if they did know [what it looked like], they would have merely called it East Sea only up to the boundary visible to them, not too far from the shore,’ a Japanese Twitter user argued.
Another Twitter user made an absurd comment, saying ‘I don’t know my geography very well, but wasn’t the East Sea originally part of Japanese territory?’
Comments from Naver:
"Ridiculous jerks… The land you guys are living in was originally Korean. We sympathetic Koreans lent the land to you out of pity for your homeless situation, and now you say something is yours when it is not? Vulgar and ignorant people, if you keep insisting, we will bury you at sea. We don’t need the island you guys live in. It’s a piece of land that will be gone anyway without leaving a mark when an earthquake strikes it… It’s easier for us, as things are done without our input. Don’t ask us to forgive and help you out when that happens. Your species should be exterminated completely! It delights me just to think about it. Goodbye, Japan."
"Hey, look, it dumbfounds me to listen to you… Let me summarise this. What does ‘originally’ mean in history, anyway? Does it then make sense [for us] to say, ‘Give us back that land because it was conquered by the King Gwang-gae-to, so it belongs to South Korea,’ huh? Should I blame the sheer nonsense that you are spitting out to the radioactivity or what… I am Korean, but Korean netizens shouldn’t just swear [at the Japanese]. We don’t have to lower ourselves to their standards! Let’s criticize them intelligently. It’s not difficult to beat the Japanese monkeys without swearing at them."
"Give me just one reason why Japan shouldn’t be treated like a dog."
"Animals are known to respond when they feel a natural disaster coming."
Source: koreabang

Korea and Japan have been on a battle on the petition board [We the People] of the White House website regarding the issue of naming the East Sea, on the 21st of April. The battle has sparked criticism from Japanese netizens against the marking of East Sea, which has since spread rapidly online.
There is a continuous stream of posts on the website 2ch (www.2ch.net) reproaching the petition from Korea to mark the Sea as the East Sea. This website is an anonymous online community with the largest number of simultaneous log-ins in the world.
A Japanese netizen claimed that ‘it is dogmatic of Korea to mark the sea as East Sea, as nowhere else in the East Asia – including Japan, Taiwan and China – refer to it as the East Sea.’
Another netizen rolled out some raw insults, saying that Korea has little influence on the international community, and the East Sea would have been called the Pacific Ocean if Japan didn’t exist.
There were also posts against the name East Sea that instead suggested using the name ‘Gyeong-Hae’, one of the archaic names for the East Sea.
The writer explained that Gyeong-Hae would be suitable, because Japan can accept it as an old name and Korea could approve it since the name doesn’t include the word ‘Japan.’
Japanese netizens are generating a similar stream of criticism on SNS in the country.
A picture file explaining how to sign up on the petition opposing East Sea mark is spreading rapidly on Twitter, and the message encouraging participation in the petition is getting retweeted constantly.
‘Koreans argue that they have called it East Sea since before Christ, but I don’t think they could have grasped the shape of Sea of Japan. Even if they did know [what it looked like], they would have merely called it East Sea only up to the boundary visible to them, not too far from the shore,’ a Japanese Twitter user argued.
Another Twitter user made an absurd comment, saying ‘I don’t know my geography very well, but wasn’t the East Sea originally part of Japanese territory?’
Comments from Naver:
"Ridiculous jerks… The land you guys are living in was originally Korean. We sympathetic Koreans lent the land to you out of pity for your homeless situation, and now you say something is yours when it is not? Vulgar and ignorant people, if you keep insisting, we will bury you at sea. We don’t need the island you guys live in. It’s a piece of land that will be gone anyway without leaving a mark when an earthquake strikes it… It’s easier for us, as things are done without our input. Don’t ask us to forgive and help you out when that happens. Your species should be exterminated completely! It delights me just to think about it. Goodbye, Japan."
"Hey, look, it dumbfounds me to listen to you… Let me summarise this. What does ‘originally’ mean in history, anyway? Does it then make sense [for us] to say, ‘Give us back that land because it was conquered by the King Gwang-gae-to, so it belongs to South Korea,’ huh? Should I blame the sheer nonsense that you are spitting out to the radioactivity or what… I am Korean, but Korean netizens shouldn’t just swear [at the Japanese]. We don’t have to lower ourselves to their standards! Let’s criticize them intelligently. It’s not difficult to beat the Japanese monkeys without swearing at them."
"Give me just one reason why Japan shouldn’t be treated like a dog."
"Animals are known to respond when they feel a natural disaster coming."
Source: koreabang
no subject
Date: 2012-04-28 09:30 pm (UTC)PRIORITIES PEOPLE: both Japan and Korea have more urgent things to deal with
"Give me just one reason why Japan shouldn’t be treated like a dog."
"Animals are known to respond when they feel a natural disaster coming."
Really now?
no subject
Date: 2012-04-28 09:31 pm (UTC)those last few netizen comments reminded me of when i was studying in beijing and news of the japanese earthquake came up everywhere.. my korean classmates were joyous D:
no subject
Date: 2012-04-29 01:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-29 01:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-29 03:33 am (UTC)I guess if you think of Germany and what they did in WWI and WWII. You'd understand why so many held grudges against them.
What the Japanese did was just horrifying. I'm Chinese and to this day there are still shows/movies that are based on the war ect. And I remember I used to study a poems, songs and stories when I was little that talked about what the Japanese did.
no subject
Date: 2012-04-30 02:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-29 03:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-28 09:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-28 10:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-29 11:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-28 09:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-28 10:07 pm (UTC)NETIZENS ARE MOSTLY BORED AND CRAZY
WHO GIVES A SHIT
I REALISE THE IRONY OF THIS COMMENT BUT I'M ALSO A LITTLE DRUNK SO I DON't GIVE A SHIT
no subject
Date: 2012-04-28 10:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-28 11:34 pm (UTC)Of course, Japanese imperialism was an inhumane reign, but seriously, let things go already.
Do you really understand the magnitude of the first part of your own sentence? It's extremely disrespectful to tell people who've been oppressed that a) it's their fault they feel that way ('inferiority complex'.....smh) and b) to suck it up and move on, especially if they feel as if their oppression is ongoing.
no subject
Date: 2012-04-28 11:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-29 12:15 am (UTC)what I mean is in order to have a future, if past relationships cannot be healed and both parties cannot let go of their hate, there will always be this issue.
I agree with this as well, but it's very naive to think that hate can be let go of just by making a conscious decision to let it go or whatnot because that takes a lot of forgiveness on one end's party first--the party that was oppressed. That forgiveness is going to take a lot of time, and Japan really doesn't make it easy when they themselves are still doing things like undercompensating WWII comfort women or even the relatively recent practice of revisionist textbooks. That's why "small things" like this sea issue is important to Koreans, because it's one of the few things they can still fight for. I would really like to see mutual settlement too, but I think it can also be achieved by letting those who have felt wronged express their dissatisfaction, such as Korea's continued advocating for their version of the sea name. Can it be done in a more diplomatic (read: not like those Naver comments) way? Of course. But what's important is that it the freedom to do so remains.
It's a tragedy that your country was affected as well* (as was mine...by two other imperalist nations as well), but it's also a little surprising in that regard because that would warrant some empathy, or at least the understanding that not everyone copes with oppression in the same way. Great for those in which forgiveness comes quickly. For others, it takes different amounts of time and different kinds of outlets.
(*though it is my observation that it was only during WWII were China and Korea similarly affected by Japan. Otherwise, the Korea-Japan relationship is different and farther-reaching. A more accurate comparison to that one would be the Vietnam-China relationship, in which China plays Japan's role, incidentally enough.)
no subject
Date: 2012-04-29 02:06 am (UTC)what are you talking about -_-
no subject
Date: 2012-04-29 02:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-29 03:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-29 03:54 am (UTC)Not that I don't agree that there exist better ways to resolve this--there certainly do.
no subject
Date: 2012-04-29 03:01 am (UTC)Very few people hates Japanese citizens. But they hate that the government still refuses to totally accept what happened.
no subject
Date: 2012-04-28 11:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-29 01:59 am (UTC)The land you guys are living in was originally Korean. We sympathetic Koreans lent the land to you out of pity for your homeless situation, and now you say something is yours when it is not?
What?
"Give me just one reason why Japan shouldn’t be treated like a dog."
"Animals are known to respond when they feel a natural disaster coming."
Arguments over some uninhabitable islets does not constitute treating an entire group of people like they were animals and not human. These sentences are just ridiculous.
no subject
Date: 2012-04-29 04:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-29 02:01 am (UTC)japan is awesome regardless
no subject
Date: 2012-04-29 02:59 am (UTC)It was Korean land.
US divided up the land after WW2.
Now they belong to Japan because US just arbitrarily gave it to Japan in the treaty.
no subject
Date: 2012-04-29 04:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-29 11:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-29 07:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-29 11:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-29 04:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-04-29 08:40 am (UTC)srs bsnsissue would be resolved quickly