[identity profile] loverboy.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] omonatheydid

The latest in the breast-feeding wars comes all the way from South Korea and involves the epitome of American snacktime: the Oreo cookie.

An ad from Agency Cheil Worldwide pairs the crème-filled treat with an unlikely image: a super-cute baby holding the cookie while nursing on his mama’s breast. The accompanying slogan: “Milk’s favorite cookie.” (It's unclear if Nabisco, maker of Oreos, is actually using the ad or if the agency just created it.)


It’s one thing to cheer when other cultures portray breast-feeding as normal. But isn’t there something kind of... icky… about the way this ad blatantly sexualizes breast-feeding?

Let’s begin with the obvious: Breasts don’t look like that when you are nursing, all air-brushed and perky and perfect. (At least, mine sure didn’t. Apologies for the TMI.) Where are the stretch marks, the cracked nipples?

Not that breast-feeding is not beautiful, and natural – it is. But it’s hardly glamorous or sexy, and by looking at this ad, you’d think some model just left the catwalk to feed her child. If that actually is her child: Is this even a lactating mother?

The photo also conjures up the image of some ad genius – we’re betting it was a guy, or a group of them – sitting around thinking, “How can we make a cookie look sexy?” Cookies. Milk. Kids. Breast milk. Boobs!

Sure, the ad is provocative, which in itself makes it effective. But it’s textbook juvenile.

Just skim the comments of a Huffington Post story on the ad (which is where we first read about it; hat tip) to see the male reaction.

"I am now going to buy a case of Oreos," writes HuffPo "Super User" Jack Davies.

And poster Builderman55 comments: "Lucky baby...."

It’s extra ironic that the ad targets a narrow audience – families with babies – that is likely to respond, knowingly: “Well, that baby is way too young to eat a cookie.” (Then again, maybe it is geared to a demographic of dudes who eat Oreos and like pretty breasts and cute babies.)

On an Adsoftheworld.com’s post, a commenter named Hadrons said:
“Simply not pleasant. Nor appealing. (Are you going to have a nice warm cup of mother’s milk with your cookie now?)”

Another commenter, Tom Megginson, said he likes it and points out that “the idea of paralleling cow’s milk and human milk is hardly new…Let’s not forget that La Leche League in the USA partners with the California 'Got Milk?' people.”

He also says he is amused by “how shocked and offended adults are by just seeing a breastfeeding image. I guess this is the reason nursing women are still subjected to social apartheid by anti-nature prudes.”

An anti-nature prude? Not so much. An anti-women-being-objectified prude? I can live with that.



source: Today Moms, adsoftheworld
Page 1 of 2 << [1] [2] >>

Date: 2012-04-28 04:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rennehollic.livejournal.com
.......what can you say when you advertise a cookie like that?

Date: 2012-04-28 04:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ari-meh.livejournal.com
errr...
that boob looks really weird.

Date: 2012-04-29 02:07 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] k4shia.livejournal.com
because it's not baby's mother's boob. it's some model's. obviously there's no milk in that boob~

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ari-meh.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-04-29 02:10 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] 4minutesluts.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-04-29 02:11 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ari-meh.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-04-29 02:14 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2012-04-28 04:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] in-noctem.livejournal.com
Poor baby, immortalized in an oreo ad while being breastfed

Date: 2012-04-28 04:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ari-meh.livejournal.com
imagine the stigma when he grows up :'D

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] pistolkrystle.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-04-29 05:06 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] ashlienl.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-04-29 12:07 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] kaylapoo.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-05-01 10:45 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2012-04-28 04:44 pm (UTC)

Date: 2012-04-28 04:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] turielen.livejournal.com
As someone who works in the industry: NO. Absolutely not. Hell no. HELL to the fucking NO.

Date: 2012-04-28 07:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paulaaaaa.livejournal.com
Same here, that wouldn't be allowed.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] turielen.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-04-30 02:32 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2012-04-28 04:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lady-theta.livejournal.com
...the baby is side-eyeing the cookie.

Date: 2012-04-28 08:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lydzi.livejournal.com
That's all I could see tbh. I was "how is that an add since the baby doesn't seem to be impressed with the oreo in the first place"?

Date: 2012-04-28 04:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jeit91.livejournal.com
NSFW!!!!!!!!!!!!

Date: 2012-04-28 04:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lainmyownworld.livejournal.com
LOL OMG.


Okay, I'm pretty sure thats just something someone came up with 10 minutes before a meeting. >.<

omg
(deleted comment)

Date: 2012-04-28 05:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tiggie0307.livejournal.com
At a lost for words rn lol

Date: 2012-04-28 05:10 pm (UTC)

Date: 2012-04-28 05:11 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] benihime99.livejournal.com
Holy photoshop

Date: 2012-04-28 05:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnnyquest89.livejournal.com
didn't read the article but crt+f'd "got milk" and that's all i needed to see to understand.

Date: 2012-04-28 05:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] the-erotomanic.livejournal.com
i don't really see how this sexualizes breast-feeding. i'm more offended by the fact that they had to cover the nipple with an oreao. but overall, i thought it was kinda tongue-in-cheek. i mean it's not totally logical, but i get the general message.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] the-erotomanic.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-04-28 05:24 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2012-04-28 05:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sirhin.livejournal.com
...Well this is an interesting advertisement.

I remember seeing an ad with a breastfeeding mother in the subway once in Korea so I'm not all that surprised (though I was tempted to take a picture of that advertisement but I was in a hurry). I guess I can see the correlation. /blink The baby's cute? I want Oreo's - and it's because I love the little things, not because I have a thing for breast-feeding, Oreo-munching babies. ;)

Date: 2012-04-28 05:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nortonamo.livejournal.com
who doesn't like cookies and milk, though. lbr

Date: 2012-04-28 05:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zeldas.livejournal.com
there's wtf-how-what advertisements with a good shock factor, and then there's this...

Date: 2012-04-28 05:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hileahrious.livejournal.com
LOL..........

Date: 2012-04-28 05:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lovely4evr.livejournal.com
I've never actually tried an oreo.Are they nice?

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] in-noctem.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-04-28 06:21 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] swhyeon1991.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-04-28 06:35 pm (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] swhyeon1991.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-04-28 07:57 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] tendrejoue.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-04-28 10:35 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] anconeous.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-04-29 01:32 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] olive-101.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-04-29 02:29 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] lovely4evr.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-04-28 07:44 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] madelyn93.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-04-29 02:37 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] lazmy.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-04-29 03:56 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] asnindie.livejournal.com - Date: 2012-04-29 11:58 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2012-04-28 05:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] deerlike.livejournal.com
I can't help but feel grossed out - not by the breast or the breast-feeding, but the thought of eating Oreos with warmed up breast-milk. /gagging

You know that can't taste good.

Date: 2012-04-28 05:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] luvey.livejournal.com
i know that for some breastfeeding can be a fetish for a small grouping of a population. but i see nothing sexual (even with partial nip) about this ad. shrug. it's just an odd advertisement overall.

Date: 2012-04-28 05:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] angelicoma.livejournal.com
I'm peeved with the technicalities /or lack of/ of this ad.
Concept wise, I don't understand how they came up with this and had it approved, because I couldn't see the connection at all.
This is distortion of reality gone wrong.

Date: 2012-04-28 06:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maffinoyobiai.livejournal.com
They did not air this ad, it said in an article somewhere (msn.com I think) that they never intended to use this ad, it was just made for fun and leaked out.
Edited Date: 2012-04-28 06:30 pm (UTC)

Date: 2012-04-28 06:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cordyceps.livejournal.com
This whole ad is just innately hilarious to me. HAVE YOUR OREOS WITH SOME WARM BREAST MILK PPL.

Date: 2012-04-28 06:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paigeeybby.livejournal.com
I am cracking the fuck up tbh. LOL. Its pretty genius.
Page 1 of 2 << [1] [2] >>

Profile

omonatheydid: (Default)
omonatheymoved

March 2022

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 2026-03-03 02:48 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios