Note: Toshiro Ono is a freelance nonfiction writer who writes mostly about the mafia and crime. Below is a translation of his blog entry that details actions taken by both sides of the CJeS and Avex lawsuit, as well as his thoughts on the reasoning behind those actions.
Signs of Progress
The below is from records of the trial between C-JeS Entertainment and Avex Management at Tokyo District Court. (Trial Material for Civil Section 29. 2011(ワ)No.17612, Plaintiff : C-JeS Entertainment, Defendant : Avex Management Document prepared by C-JeS Entertainment on Oct. 19, 2011)
The “attorney for the plaintiff” mentioned here means the attorney representing C-JeS in the trial at the Tokyo District Court.
“On Sept. 22, 2011 the attorney for the plaintiff [T/N: attorney for C-JeS in Japan] received a call from Attorney Jihye Shin who is representing JYJ in Korea saying “We received a request from SM for reconciliation for both the trial in Korea and Japan. However we find it difficult to understand their true motive in making this request.”
Recently in the lawsuit in Korea concerning the validity of the exclusive long term contract between management companies and artists, the Supreme Court ruled that long term contracts between management companies and artists are invalid, signifying there is a high chance that the Korean court will rule in JYJ’s favor in the lawsuit between SM and JYJ. It can be presumed that SM, because of this turn of events, decided that it would be better to resolve the lawsuits in both Korea and Japan at once by reconciliation. Also, the request made by SM to Attorney Shin assumes that the defendant [T/N: Avex Management] will follow SM’s instructions. Therefore it is easy to presume that the defendant is obstructing the management of JYJ in Japan out of concern for the wishes of SM.”
[rest omitted]
Source: Toshiro Ono’s Blog
Translation by: TheJYJFiles
Please do not add, alter, or remove the credits
Signs of Progress
The below is from records of the trial between C-JeS Entertainment and Avex Management at Tokyo District Court. (Trial Material for Civil Section 29. 2011(ワ)No.17612, Plaintiff : C-JeS Entertainment, Defendant : Avex Management Document prepared by C-JeS Entertainment on Oct. 19, 2011)
The “attorney for the plaintiff” mentioned here means the attorney representing C-JeS in the trial at the Tokyo District Court.
“On Sept. 22, 2011 the attorney for the plaintiff [T/N: attorney for C-JeS in Japan] received a call from Attorney Jihye Shin who is representing JYJ in Korea saying “We received a request from SM for reconciliation for both the trial in Korea and Japan. However we find it difficult to understand their true motive in making this request.”
Recently in the lawsuit in Korea concerning the validity of the exclusive long term contract between management companies and artists, the Supreme Court ruled that long term contracts between management companies and artists are invalid, signifying there is a high chance that the Korean court will rule in JYJ’s favor in the lawsuit between SM and JYJ. It can be presumed that SM, because of this turn of events, decided that it would be better to resolve the lawsuits in both Korea and Japan at once by reconciliation. Also, the request made by SM to Attorney Shin assumes that the defendant [T/N: Avex Management] will follow SM’s instructions. Therefore it is easy to presume that the defendant is obstructing the management of JYJ in Japan out of concern for the wishes of SM.”
[rest omitted]
Source: Toshiro Ono’s Blog
Translation by: TheJYJFiles
Please do not add, alter, or remove the credits
no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 05:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 07:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 08:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 08:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 09:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 02:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 06:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 09:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 08:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 09:55 pm (UTC)http://omonatheydidnt.livejournal.com/5943807.html#comments
basically it means they ban everything which has JYJfiles in the credit
no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 08:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 09:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 09:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 05:35 pm (UTC)What would reconciliation entail anyway?
no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 05:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 05:54 pm (UTC)Someone either needs to pay the other off or end this crap.
JYJ aren't going back that's the only for sure at this point.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 06:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 08:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 08:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 08:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 02:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 07:04 pm (UTC)honestly, i think the judge would rather they fix this problem within themselves and have a settlement rather than battle it out in court.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 07:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 07:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 08:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 11:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 08:57 pm (UTC)Nothing new tbqh :(
no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 08:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 09:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 04:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 09:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 02:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 02:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 09:21 pm (UTC)I may be wrong, though, I'm still at a loss half of the time when it comes to this lawsuit.no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 09:34 pm (UTC)And yeah, it is going to take forever, I think ;__;
no subject
Date: 2011-11-03 11:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 03:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 03:47 am (UTC)Also, the jyj boys (I am not talking about HM because we don't know it) hasn't got their share from the mirotic concert.
And.. SME still claim that JYJ owned them money from breaching out from contract that the court has been nullified.
It's a lost battle for SME, the only thing why they prolong the process is so they have a ground to ban and interfering jyj works
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 05:16 am (UTC)But can anyone fill me in about this: the Supreme Court ruled that long term contracts between management companies and artists are invalid. Sounds radical. Have all longterm contracts in SK now been voided? Were there a lot of artists who saw their contracts disappear due to this?
no subject
Date: 2011-11-05 07:41 am (UTC)Cjes is doing their best and they've always released leveled headed and direct statements. They don't beat around the bush and they speak to the core of the issue. I don't know why people try to down them so much.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-05 05:34 pm (UTC)As for J-CeS's rhetoric. I guess, once again, it's a difference of sensitivities. Granted, it's hard to tell when judging on awkward translations, but as it written here, it definitely comes off petulant to me. In cultures that value pride so much, if I were Avex in Japan or KBS in Korea, I wouldn't want to be seen as "giving in" to them, hell I might just drag the battle on a little longer just for the spite of it. J-CeS is a much smaller player than its rivals. I can see that they're going all out and burning the bridges on their way, but... I just fear that in the end the cards won't fall in their favor after all.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-06 07:14 am (UTC)SMent thinks they're above the law, thats the only problem here.
no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 09:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-04 02:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-05 07:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-11-06 06:11 am (UTC)