![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
opal.livejournal.com posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
omonatheydid
Earlier, we reported about a scandal involving gagman ‘K‘, who was accused by a woman named ‘A‘ of raping her in his vehicle.
To backtrack, the two met at a night club in Gangnam, Seoul where Mr. K offered a ride home to ‘A’. According to ‘A’, Mr. K parked the car near a coffee shop and sexually assaulted her. ‘K’ has defended himself by insisting that they had sex was done under mutual consent, and furthermore, ‘A’ had signed a document acknowledging that she gave ‘K’ her consent.
Within just one day, ‘A’ retracted her complaint against ‘K’.
On October 14th, the chief of Yangcheon’s police station revealed, “Yesterday (October 13th), the defendant’s attorney came by and submitted the plaintiff’s cancellation document for the complaint. We will call upon ‘A’ as soon as possible to confirm the information on the document.”
According to reports, the cancellation document had a statement which read, “[The] mutual misunderstandings have been resolved” as the reason for the complaint’s withdrawal.
Due to the retraction, further investigations and prosecution against gagman ‘K’ will most likely not occur.
The police shared, “Because this case was formed by the plaintiff’s complaint, it makes it difficult for us to continue our investigation on ‘K’ when the plaintiff retracted her complaint. We have no plans on bringing ‘K’ to our station.”
As for the contract of mutual consent which ‘K’ claimed to posses, the police revealed, “”K’ did not submit the document and therefore, we could not confirm whether it truly existed.”
Source + Photos: Sports Chosun via Nate via AKP
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2011-10-15 11:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 12:01 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-10-15 11:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 12:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 12:00 am (UTC)So she was paid off?
no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 12:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 02:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 12:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 12:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 12:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 12:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 12:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 12:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 12:32 am (UTC)As the case hit you could hear all the fucking lecherous assholes gathering to make this go away. Ugh. I fee bad for pretty girls in Entertainment, I bet they get harassed so much. Next time some old douche fuck gives you a ride but instead parks up in an empty lot, kick him in his balls.
So mad right now.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 12:41 am (UTC)prettygirls in Entertainment.Fixed it.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 12:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 12:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 12:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 12:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 12:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 12:43 am (UTC)AKA She was threatened till she backed down :(
no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 12:52 am (UTC)....... oh ok
no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 12:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 02:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 12:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 12:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 12:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 01:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 01:15 am (UTC)OP, your icon is fabulous!
no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 01:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 01:33 am (UTC)"[The] mutual misunderstandings have been resolved," does make me raise an eyebrow since rape doesn't have a gray area. No means no and just because they person can't say it doesn't mean someone scored a yahtzee. It has me suspect 'A' was coerced and during this short time convinced that meant she had given consent and thus had no lawsuit. The document dalso rives me a little nutter because, like I said previously, it was possible (if this was a one night stand contract) that she had signed with intention of giving consent, but changed her mind.
Can't quite decide if it's because of how quick this was pulled under, the shady choice quotes, or that this revolves around rape and how stastically unlikely it is for a woman to cry wolf on this has me doubting 'K's' innocence more than the previous article. Well, that and again the general understanding of how S. Korea thinks of rape. Blech.
no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 02:14 am (UTC)this so much. not that it even needs to be said, but a lack of no doesn't mean yes, but unfortunately some men don't seem to get that.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-10-16 01:35 am (UTC)