
Fresh public debates have been ignited over songs labeled by censors as “harmful to youth” due to the mention of alcohol-related phrases in the lyrics.
Some popular K-pop songs like “Day When It Rains” by boy band Beast and “You Can Eat Well” by the male duo Homme have been banned for those under 19 by the Youth Protection Committee (YPC) under the Ministry of Gender Equality & Family for containing lyrics about alcohol.
Among the lyrics of “Day When It Rains” is the line, “I should stop drinking as I’m drunk.” The song “You Can Eat Well” contains the lines,“I’ll drink heavily with my friends to forget everything” and “Blub, blub, blub after I drank heavily yesterday.”
The YPC monitors all newly released albums and rates songs according to their use of profane language, references to drugs or sexual references.
Last year, 490 songs were labeled as detrimental to youth. In the first half of this year, 310 songs have already received the rating.
In its latest rating decision, the YPC slapped the “harmful to youth” ruling on popular boy band 2PM’s song “Hands Up” on Sunday.
In protest of the YPC’s adoption of tougher rules on song ratings, some netizens have launched an online campaign to collect signatures to abolish the “19-year-old ban” rating system.
Albums with the rating have a cover sticker prohibiting its sale to those under 19, and labeled songs are not allowed to be broadcast on television or radio between 1 p.m. and 10 p.m. on weekdays and 10 a.m. and 10 p.m. on weekends.
Such decisions are made by a nine-member committee consisting of journalists, civic group members, professionals in the music industry and album critics. The YPC refuses to make public the list of committee members.
Court ruling on Thursday
In response music fans and experts in the music industry claim the labeling is conducted in an arbitrary manner and argue that it is almost impossible to fairly review 30,000 songs annually.
SM Entertainment [Shouldn't this be Cube?], the agency representing Beast, has filed a suit in an administrative court to nullify the “harmful to youth” rating, with the ruling scheduled for Thursday.
Under mounting criticism, the ministry held a discussion session last week that included professors, songwriters and youth consultants.
Professor Park Byung-sik from Dongguk University said the labeling is necessary because lyrics can have a great influence on the young, who listen to music repeatedly.
“One of the reasons young people are now more violent than in the past is because of the music they listen to, and that’s why other countries also have a reviewing committee,” he said.
But given the claims that the labeling is too arbitrary here, he suggested more detailed guidelines are necessary to properly monitor songs and regulate harmful music.
Songwriter Yoo Yoo-jin said the current monitoring and labeling system is outdated and often makes false accusations.
“Sometimes the YPC’s decision discourages people from the music industry as they are labeled creators of harmful content and isolates them from possible fans,” Yoo said. “It’s not right to label music as harmful just because lyrics have such key words as ’ or ‘drinking.’”
He admitted the necessity of monitoring songs by the YPC but said that additional measures are required.
“I think the current committee should maintain its job, but a second round of reviews is necessary by ordinary people such as parents and teachers. I think their opinions should also be reflected,” Yoo said.
Kim Se-joong, from the National Institute of the Korean Language, suggested that a volunteer monitoring body comprising industry professionals could be a good alternative.
In her defense, Lee Young-hee, a member of the YPC, said strict monitoring is necessary as some lyrics can encourage young people to drink or give the impression that drinking can be a solution to any problem.
“I think young people can be easily influenced by what they listen to. They may justify the drinking or violence described in lyrics in their favorite songs,” she said.
After the discussion session, the ministry said it plans to hold more discussion sessions and come up with supplementary measures to current labeling by the end of this year.
Source: Kim Tae-jong @ The Korea Times
Video source: KikiBigBangVIP
no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 01:19 pm (UTC)That's certainly not the case, but it's a convenient lie.
no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 01:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 01:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 01:21 pm (UTC)Ministry of Gender Equality or whatever should back the fuck up and fix that "sexy dance" double-standard
no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 01:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 01:22 pm (UTC)And in most cultures as long as you don't abuse alcohol, it's generally accepted.
no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 01:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 01:28 pm (UTC)if they'll be influenced by a song, then parents shouldn't be allowed to drink in front of their kids too, but we know that it happens all the time (at least where i live). and i think see your parents drinking seems more harmful then listen to a song about it.
no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 01:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 01:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 01:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 01:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 02:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 01:53 pm (UTC)I think that if children were brought up right (by this I mean to have firm values and a clear idea of what they want), they wouldn't be easily influenced to copy what they see in the media at all. I'm pretty sure people don't listen to the radio and think "Oh I'm going to start drinking now because the word "alcohol" appears in these songs."
no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 01:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 01:54 pm (UTC)BLUB BLUB BLUB
omg didnt know my catchphrase was in there
new fav song~
no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 01:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 01:54 pm (UTC)also i wasn't aware lyricists had a responsibility to be educational/instructional/"wholesome~"
but what do i know i'm not a parent
no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 02:24 pm (UTC)idk should some ministry really be saying what we can or cannot say in song lyrics? i'm not too comfortable with that idea.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:need help? call this guy.
From:no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 01:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 02:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 02:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 02:25 pm (UTC)PLEASE!
no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 02:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 02:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 02:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 02:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 02:51 pm (UTC)a) kids nowadays are more violent/more rude/whatever now than they were before.
b) these problems are the direct cause of music/tv/games/whatever
Because you know? They said that 50 years ago. They said that 100 years ago. They said that 150 years ago. The past always seems to have this golden glow on it where apparently kids used to be sunshine and roses. But there have always *been* kids who cause disturbances/violence/etc with the only change being *what* is considered a problem, how it's monitored and what aspect of pop culture is being blamed.
And, while I do see the point that music or TV etc might lead some kids to certain decisions, it won't reprogram them all, particularly not if parents actually sit down and work at being parents. Parents might not always be able to help, but neither will blocking words out of the media *particularly* since the banning standards of the YPC seem to be so half-hazard. They *themselves* don't seem to have a clear idea on what constitutes harmful.
Anyway, if it were true that kids would emulate everything they saw in music videos, they'd probably have to bad 75% of MVs. I mean aren't you worried that kids will become vandals focused on grafitti and blowing shit up after watching a 2NE1 vid? Or they're gonna want to break into a clothes store in the middle of the night after watching a SNSD vid! Think of the children!!1!
no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 02:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 02:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 05:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 04:02 pm (UTC)Instead of explaining and educating, they are banning. Kids will never learn why...
makes me remember a parents who just say "NO, You can't" without explanation and expect the kids to just follow their order. That's not how it's work. As soon as you take away your eyes off of them, they will do exactly what you told them not to.
no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 04:06 pm (UTC)I don't think young people are that stupid.
“I think the current committee should maintain its job, but a second round of reviews is necessary by ordinary people such as parents and teachers. I think their opinions should also be reflected,” Yoo said.
Hey, that actually sounds like a good idea. Get people who actually are involved with the youth.
no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 04:08 pm (UTC)they learned it from seeing their dad come home piss drunk/the 아저씨 passed out on the corner.get a hold of yourself, korea.no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 11:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 04:24 pm (UTC)South Korea needs to realize that Parents are there for a reason, normally educate their children in things like this, just sayin'.
(And now that we're on it, I think Spanish drinking culture has done more for my drinking habits
this sounds horrible lolthan any song I've ever listened.)no subject
Date: 2011-08-23 11:40 pm (UTC)