Following the release of KBS’s statement addressing JYJ’s exclusion on their programs, JYJ’s agency were quick to fire back at the broadcast station, deeming their excuse as “illogical“.
On May 18th, CJES Entertainment rebutted, “The lawsuit about JYJ’s subordinate contract with SM Entertainment that KBS was referring to was already acknowledged by the court as lopsided and disadvantageous to JYJ, and the contract was subsequently nullified.”
“In addition, last February, the invalidity of their contract with SME was emphasized once more as the court declared another order for SME to stop indirectly impeding on JYJ’s activities. With these being said, we believe KBS’s stance does not match up with the facts.”
They continued, “When SM Entertainment lodged a lawsuit regarding the ‘dual contract’, the court rejected their argument and ordered SM to not interfere with JYJ’s activities with CJES Entertainment. Considering JYJ’s lonely fight against such a huge agency in request for a more reasonable contract, we believe it is wrong that KBS is deviating from the objective truth and making the public think that JYJ are just creating more societal problems. We strongly request for them to make corrections on their part.”
“Especially with JYJ currently participating in overseas promotional projects with various countries, as well as being appointed highly ranked ambassadors, we’re very disappointed that they are speaking of JYJ as threats to the culture industry,” concluded CJES Entertainment.
Sources: Nate News via AKP
On May 18th, CJES Entertainment rebutted, “The lawsuit about JYJ’s subordinate contract with SM Entertainment that KBS was referring to was already acknowledged by the court as lopsided and disadvantageous to JYJ, and the contract was subsequently nullified.”
“In addition, last February, the invalidity of their contract with SME was emphasized once more as the court declared another order for SME to stop indirectly impeding on JYJ’s activities. With these being said, we believe KBS’s stance does not match up with the facts.”
They continued, “When SM Entertainment lodged a lawsuit regarding the ‘dual contract’, the court rejected their argument and ordered SM to not interfere with JYJ’s activities with CJES Entertainment. Considering JYJ’s lonely fight against such a huge agency in request for a more reasonable contract, we believe it is wrong that KBS is deviating from the objective truth and making the public think that JYJ are just creating more societal problems. We strongly request for them to make corrections on their part.”
“Especially with JYJ currently participating in overseas promotional projects with various countries, as well as being appointed highly ranked ambassadors, we’re very disappointed that they are speaking of JYJ as threats to the culture industry,” concluded CJES Entertainment.
Sources: Nate News via AKP
no subject
Date: 2011-05-18 09:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-18 09:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-18 09:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-18 09:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-18 09:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-18 09:24 pm (UTC)...seriously someone has got to stop "them" from putting JYJ + threats to the culture industry in the same sentence.. it makes no sense to me!
no subject
Date: 2011-05-18 09:26 pm (UTC)I almost forgive them for the earlier PR they did for JYJ last year e_e;
no subject
Date: 2011-05-18 09:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-05-18 09:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-18 09:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-18 09:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-18 09:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-05-18 09:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-18 09:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-18 09:40 pm (UTC)Well said, CJes!
no subject
Date: 2011-05-19 02:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-18 09:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-19 12:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-18 10:09 pm (UTC)i cant believe KBS tried to say JYJ were a threat to the cultural industry. who the fuck wrote that shit? that is practically slander. it was an insulting, opinion based statement that a company as large as they should kno better than to make. they basically confirmed everyone's suspicion that JYJ were being cockblocked. assholes.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-18 10:16 pm (UTC)kbs, don't make me laugh. with all their ambassador roles, oversea promotions, and charities. definitely dirtying the image of korean industry. if anything, you're the one giving the industry a bad rep by doing this.
and if it's you still pressuring broadcasting stations, i honestly don't understand how appearing on music shows and varieties will hurt you, sme.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-19 11:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-18 10:18 pm (UTC)i wonder what KBS going to say next, if they're going to say anything at all
no subject
Date: 2011-05-18 10:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-18 10:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-18 10:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-18 11:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-18 11:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-19 01:51 am (UTC)This part confuses me, isn't the trial to void the contract (for JCS)/confirm contract validity (for SME) is still ongoing? When did the trial wrapped up and the judge gave this verdict?
C-JeS cannot say the contract is invalid when in truth JCS only won the injuction to NOT participate in activities scheduled by SME and are free to pursue their own without interference from the agency. This situation is not what I called 'nullified'.
no subject
Date: 2011-05-19 04:56 am (UTC)bullshitnice letter about how because of their ongoing contract with SME, and supposed contract with C-JeS, JYJ should not be allowed on radio or television because they were locked in a dual contract. In one of the preliminary hearings it was decided that the length of the contract as well as the terms were unfair and voided the contract. It was also proven that C-Jes is just representing them. They have not signed a formal contract under the company. C-JeS merely takes care of their PR. Therefore any complaints about a dual contract were irrelevant.Despite this, broadcasting stations are still hesitant to broadcast JYJ, and the only logical explanation is fear of the repercussions and backlash from SME. The courts have, in fact, given JYJ the go ahead to promote freely and conduct individual activities sometime last year, and yet since then they have been banned from most major broadcasting stations. KBS 'neutral' statement was just total bull.
Sorry if this is a hot mess, I really know nothing about law and I'm just recalling what I read in an article months ago. >.>
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-05-19 02:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-19 07:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-05-19 02:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-05-19 02:57 am (UTC)