![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
strawberry-efeu.livejournal.com posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
omonatheydid
Cosmetics company Crebeau has been found not guilty for the breakup of TVXQ.
In July of 2009, the three members of JYJ had sued their now former company, SM Entertainment, stating that they were under “slave contracts”. After hearing such accusations, SME released a statement saying that the Crebeau company was to blame, as they were the ones who put such thoughts into their heads.
Upon such remarks, Crebeau fired back, stating that SM was the one that had been hiding the internal problems they had with their own artists, and that the company was purposely misleading the public. Crebeau also proceeded to take legal action against SME due to the defamation of their company.
After reviewing the case this past December, the courts decided that there was an insufficient amount of evidence to prove that Crebeau was guilty, and they therefore closed the case.
Meanwhile, Crebeau has been sponsoring Superstar K contestant Woo Eun Mi and JYJ on their various broadcasting activities.
Source: Nate & Allkpop
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 04:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 04:52 am (UTC)♥
no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 04:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 04:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 07:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 04:59 am (UTC)Another "U mad?" moment brought to you by SME.
Date: 2011-02-19 05:02 am (UTC)Re: Another "U mad?" moment brought to you by SME.
Date: 2011-02-19 05:32 am (UTC)Re: Another "U mad?" moment brought to you by SME.
From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 05:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 05:22 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 05:13 am (UTC)Im always afraid of SME's possible retaliation though, i think they will never let this matter go just like that >_<
no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 05:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 05:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 05:28 am (UTC)little by little the courts are pointing in favour of JYJ. its sad really. SM should just let it go too.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 05:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 05:37 am (UTC)lmao THIS
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 05:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 05:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 06:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 06:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 07:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 06:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 06:43 am (UTC)4 FOR JYJ COCO & ALL ASSOCIATES, YOU GO JYJ COCO.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 06:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 07:00 am (UTC)How do you solve an unlawful contract by putting a blame on third party? I still can't see it.
Crebeau or no Crebeau, the contract is still unlawful.
The next pressed thing that SME would do is suing FTC for making those set of rules.. /oh wait, they already make a petition against it. :LOL:
no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 07:20 am (UTC)SM sued Crebeau, it got dismissed.
I think they can call it even now and both can stop acting like butthurt children.
no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 07:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 07:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 07:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 02:00 pm (UTC)the boys are on a roll here :DDDD
no subject
Date: 2011-02-19 02:14 pm (UTC)