[identity profile] tofucakes.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] omonatheydid
 New regulation of outfits in music programs




It seems as if the Korean music industry has regressed 10 years with music programs introducing restrictions on the outfits of performing singers.

Clothing censorship first began in 2000 with the three major broadcast companies imposing them. Now, 10 years later, the ‘checks’ have returned once more in an effort to reduce the amount of sexually-suggestive clothing and performances that are broadcasted.

Singers in their teens and 20’s are the ones who are impacted the most by these new standards, especially for girl groups competing in an aggressive and competitive market.

Fans also have not been welcoming to the change, claiming that it’s an anachronism to the current age and are weary of an invasion on the freedom of speech and expression.

In addition, the new standards released by each broadcast company differs, thus bringing about much confusion to the singers.

SBS’s “Inkigayo” set three bans on outfits: shirts that reveal too much cleavage, shirts that expose the belly button, and wearing white shorts under miniskirts. Starting from the 4th, the producers of “Inkigayo” asked singers to make the appropriate changes, keeping the three bans in mind.

SBS stated, “It is true that we check outfits during rehearsals. However, as opposed to calling it a ‘regulation’, it’s an agreement made by all of the agencies. Every singer has a different concept and style so it’s hard for us to tell them to change this and that.“

As mentioned before, the biggest changes were made by girl groups since their outfits have become as important as their music and choreography. Girl group Rainbow’s “A” was served a ban on their ‘ab dance,’ leading them to eventually change their choreography and shirt choice.

Nine Muses were also forced to make a few changes due to the visual impact of their outfits. Their long jackets, which previously covered their hot pants, were adjusted to expose the shorts. The main reason behind the change was that it looked as if they weren’t wearing anything under the jackets.


What’s becoming a bigger problem other than the regulations is that there is no consistency. Most of the new rules focus on the top and completely ignore the bottom and there are no restrictions on hot pants and other outfits that could reveal more than one would think.

Although Rainbow was forced to change their choreography on the “Inkigayo” episode broadcast on the 4th, Chaeyeon, Narsha, and An Jinkyung were allowed to wear short hot pants without any changes and their performances were broadcast with no edits.

A couple viewers stated, “Which country in the world thinks that a belly button is sexier than legs?” and “The hot pants worn by singers lately are as short as underwear, why isn’t anyone criticizing that?”

Few are also of the opinion that public broadcasts changing their standards won’t help anything if cable broadcasts stay the same. Such regulations might force singers to show what they couldn’t on public broadcasts on cable broadcasts.

An industry representative that requested to remain anonymous commented, “It is true that there is much confusion going around because each broadcast company has different standards. If this keeps up, singers will have to create separate outfits for both public and cable.”


However, these limitations cannot be regarded in only a bad light since the heated competition amongst girl groups are forcing some of them to come up with more stimulating performances.

Many have suggested that the three broadcast companies come up with a unified regulation, as commented by one industry representative: “Every time the standards change, it just brings about more confusion with the singers. The broadcast companies must discuss in depth with the singers and come to an agreement on a guide line that works for both sides.”

Another industry representative stated, “Checking the outfits during camera rehearsals and asking them to make specific changes in a short amount of time allows room for accidents to happen. If there’s a set standard, it’s easier for singers to prepare in advance and prevent accidents.”

Secret’s agency director, Won Geunyoung, commented, “It’s important for the singers that worked hard on their song and performance to be able to freely express it. Companies that are trying to attract attention with stimulating content must learn to restrict themselves. We hope that the broadcast companies view the outfits and performances of singers with an open mind.”

source: my friend who has a bike
allkpop too i guess

Personally, I'm a fan of their bodies, so I can dig the outfits.

And I think my icon is actually relevant! Short shorts are always in, natch.
Page 1 of 5 << [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>

Date: 2010-09-10 09:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shanny-w.livejournal.com
A+ sourcing

Date: 2010-09-10 09:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] integrawh.livejournal.com
LOL. Agreed.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] deerlike.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 09:49 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2010-09-10 09:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kimishim.livejournal.com
Wellll lol :/ I hate seeing girls wearing things that are too revealing, but damn lets not become North Korea. Idc I doubt they're going to follow through with this very much so w/e

Date: 2010-09-10 09:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fakeshake3.livejournal.com
Way to go, Korea.

Date: 2010-09-10 09:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jaemin0.livejournal.com
im probably in minority, but i'm happy this is happening
idols should be popular for their talent (that usually doesnt even exist)
not the lack of clothes they're wearing.

Date: 2010-09-10 09:46 am (UTC)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] kimishim.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 09:47 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] erbalurbal.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 09:51 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] kimishim.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 09:53 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] decimatedreams.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 06:42 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] epik.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 10:06 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] beebz-x.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 02:42 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mirotic-mor.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 12:12 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] lovekyu.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 02:16 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] miyavi-type.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 04:44 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2010-09-10 09:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mayuyu.livejournal.com
Why is it only the girls who get these restrictions :/

Date: 2010-09-10 10:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gawibawibo.livejournal.com
It doesn't say the restrictions are only for the girl groups (they prolly are though), but the "no cleavage" rule should apply to male idols showing their chest? That's what I hope at least.
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] gawibawibo.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 04:32 pm (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] gawibawibo.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-11 12:41 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] mayuyu.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 11:42 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] gawibawibo.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 04:27 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] purinyappykura.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 12:06 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] purinyappykura.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 12:06 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] enchantark.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 04:08 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] fabledlamb.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 02:51 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] lobotronic.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 11:14 pm (UTC) - Expand
(deleted comment)

Date: 2010-09-10 05:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mahmoodnooni23.livejournal.com
i agree!!!things are starting to get kid-proofed now!!>

Date: 2010-09-10 09:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hp-groupie.livejournal.com
TBH...I don't feel like I'm seeing much until like...Zinger or G.NA strolls by.

Da HALE is popping out? : /

Well...can the guys at LEAST keep going shirtless? *raises eyebrow*

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] g-odalisque13.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 02:41 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] decimatedreams.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 06:43 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2010-09-10 09:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] louta.livejournal.com
I think your friend with a bike is lying.

Date: 2010-09-10 09:45 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jangwooyoung.livejournal.com
Perfect source is perfect.

Date: 2010-09-10 09:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] episkia.livejournal.com
i was never really a fan of the really revealing, 'sexy' dances but i think these people need to be consistent with what they're banning

also that first picture - her back is clothed compared to jjong's sexyback.

Date: 2010-09-10 10:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ghost-whisper.livejournal.com
I hope they don't ban Jjong's sexyback... D:

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] karilein.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 02:08 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] sayonaramelody.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-11 03:20 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] dublejointedtoe.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 09:46 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2010-09-10 09:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] royalantares.livejournal.com
No no no no.

The clothes aren't even that revealing.

Date: 2010-09-10 09:46 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] episkia.livejournal.com
i was never really a fan of the really revealing, 'sexy' dances but i think these people need to be consistent with what they're banning

also that first picture - her back is clothed compared to jjong's sexyback.

Date: 2010-09-10 09:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] asth77.livejournal.com
If the guys haven't the same regulations or don't respect them and no one tells shit..... L.O.L.

Date: 2010-09-10 09:49 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] erbalurbal.livejournal.com
I don't really see anything provocative. The shirt lifting dance might be a little inappropriate but I have seen people on the street wearing less clothes.

Date: 2010-09-10 09:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] prettyminstrel.livejournal.com
what about sexy-concepted male singers? those abs flashing and hips gyrating moves could provoke horny fangirls into raping young boys too, ya know

Date: 2010-09-10 09:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] autumnballad.livejournal.com
talent > looks.
so what you have all the looks but you cant even sing and all.

Date: 2010-09-10 09:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] 0ddie13.livejournal.com
there are no bans for guys right. I mean what would we do with Taeyang and Rain all covered up.
Image (http://img689.imageshack.us/i/untite.jpg/)

Image (http://img521.imageshack.us/i/kp612.jpg/)

Date: 2010-09-10 09:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] louta.livejournal.com
if girls have to cover up. then the guys should have to too.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] rogueslayer452.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 10:00 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] x3eviie.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 12:11 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] pikapika217.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 12:31 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] pladpuss.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 03:40 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] epik.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 09:58 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] bunny-lita.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 11:49 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] thexness.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 12:16 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] rinn1e.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 03:33 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] jonghyunf.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 11:43 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] pistol-eyes.livejournal.com - Date: 2010-09-10 05:33 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2010-09-10 09:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] audiograms.livejournal.com
Sexist much?

Date: 2010-09-10 09:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] amy.livejournal.com
Which country in the world thinks that a belly button is sexier than legs?

Thiiiiis.
(deleted comment)

Date: 2010-09-10 04:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] enchantark.livejournal.com
wtf your icon
did you make that?

Date: 2010-09-10 09:56 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] epik.livejournal.com
tl;dr
come on korea.

Date: 2010-09-10 09:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rogueslayer452.livejournal.com
So this is only banned for the female artists and not the male artists, I take it?

OIC. :/

Personally, I have no problems with what the girls are wearing. Sometimes there needs to be better fashion choices and judgment, especially for underage girl members, but I see nothing provocative with what the girls are wearing in the pictures above. And really now, how is this completely not sexist saying that the girls need this restriction while the guys don't?
Edited Date: 2010-09-10 10:02 am (UTC)

Date: 2010-09-10 09:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bea-chan22.livejournal.com
If you're gonna do this on girls, do this on guys too. Sadly, SK is a highly patriarchal society. Tbh, I'm getting sick and tired of male artists stripping and some of those who strip have talent w/c is highly frustrating, imo.

Date: 2010-09-10 09:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tees2mai.livejournal.com
Only girl groups get this ban? Korea, your sexism is obvious.

Date: 2010-09-10 10:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] epik.livejournal.com
i don't like this rule, i don't think anyone does... if you're going to ban female artists from wearing provocative clothing, why not ban it for male artists too?
Page 1 of 5 << [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>

Profile

omonatheydid: (Default)
omonatheymoved

March 2022

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 2026-03-04 08:35 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios