TVXQ 3 Members "The unfairness of the contract is grave" vs SM "The way we treat TVXQ is not bad compared to other agencies"
Three members of TVXQ (Xiah Junsu, YoungWoong Jaejoong, Micky Yoochun) and SM Entertainment had their first hearing today regarding an objection to the verdict on a contract suspension injunction that was made last year, and were unsuccessful in closing the gap between their conflicting stances.
The legal representatives of the three members of TVXQ and SM met at the Seoul District Courts at 5 p.m. on the 7th to state their stances on the lawsuit made by SM Entertainment regarding an objection to the contract suspension injunction verdict.
This hearing was held after SM filed for the lawsuit on April 12th as an objection to the partial acceptance verdict made by the Courts last year.
At the hearing, SM's representative stated, "Compared to other agencies in Korea, TVXQ's income division is not unfair," and emphasized that TVXQ's income division was not a pressing issue in the exclusive contract.
The representative also strongly questioned the three members' action of signing a separate contract with their Japanese agency AVEX although only the contract suspension injunction, not the actual lawsuit, had been partially accepted by the Courts.
On the other hand, the three members' representative stated, "The length and the income division section of the exclusive contract between SM and TVXQ is so unfair that the situation is very grave."
The judge in charge of the hearing (Judge Choi Sung Joon) questioned both sides of the possibility of a settlement, but no groundbreaking outcome came of it.
The Courts asked both sides whether a settlement could be made if the contract was fixed but received different answers.
When the Courts asked both sides if a settlement would be possible if the Courts shortened the length of the exclusive contract and if the income division was made more equal SM's representative said "Yes, a settlement would be possible," but the three members' side gave a skeptical answer and said, "The three members have lost their faith in SM and they think negatively of the prospect of working with the agency again."
However, the three members' side stated near the end of the hearing that, "If SM's desires for a settlement are sincere, then I will talk to the three members and will report back to the Courts."
On the other hand, Kim Young Min and Nam So Young attended the hearing as SM and SM Japan's representatives respectively but none of the members of TVXQ attended. The Courts will examine all files submitted by both sides till the end of this month and reach a verdict regarding SM's objection to the contract suspension injunction verdict.
Three members of TVXQ (Xiah Junsu, YoungWoong Jaejoong, Micky Yoochun) and SM Entertainment had their first hearing today regarding an objection to the verdict on a contract suspension injunction that was made last year, and were unsuccessful in closing the gap between their conflicting stances.
The legal representatives of the three members of TVXQ and SM met at the Seoul District Courts at 5 p.m. on the 7th to state their stances on the lawsuit made by SM Entertainment regarding an objection to the contract suspension injunction verdict.
This hearing was held after SM filed for the lawsuit on April 12th as an objection to the partial acceptance verdict made by the Courts last year.
At the hearing, SM's representative stated, "Compared to other agencies in Korea, TVXQ's income division is not unfair," and emphasized that TVXQ's income division was not a pressing issue in the exclusive contract.
The representative also strongly questioned the three members' action of signing a separate contract with their Japanese agency AVEX although only the contract suspension injunction, not the actual lawsuit, had been partially accepted by the Courts.
On the other hand, the three members' representative stated, "The length and the income division section of the exclusive contract between SM and TVXQ is so unfair that the situation is very grave."
The judge in charge of the hearing (Judge Choi Sung Joon) questioned both sides of the possibility of a settlement, but no groundbreaking outcome came of it.
The Courts asked both sides whether a settlement could be made if the contract was fixed but received different answers.
When the Courts asked both sides if a settlement would be possible if the Courts shortened the length of the exclusive contract and if the income division was made more equal SM's representative said "Yes, a settlement would be possible," but the three members' side gave a skeptical answer and said, "The three members have lost their faith in SM and they think negatively of the prospect of working with the agency again."
However, the three members' side stated near the end of the hearing that, "If SM's desires for a settlement are sincere, then I will talk to the three members and will report back to the Courts."
On the other hand, Kim Young Min and Nam So Young attended the hearing as SM and SM Japan's representatives respectively but none of the members of TVXQ attended. The Courts will examine all files submitted by both sides till the end of this month and reach a verdict regarding SM's objection to the contract suspension injunction verdict.
Source: [spn edaily]
Translation credits: jeeelim5 @
tohosomnia
Shared by: tohosomnia.net
Do not remove/add on any credits
Translation credits: jeeelim5 @
Shared by: tohosomnia.net
Do not remove/add on any credits
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:15 pm (UTC)i guess it's up to the court and the members now.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:17 pm (UTC)Gee, after the lying, and the canceled concerts blamed on them, and the dragging uninvolved people into it, and the MORE LYING, I can't imagine why they'd have difficulty wanting to work with the company again.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 05:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:18 pm (UTC)Lol, SM. Don't measure by the lowest common denominator. I'm personally not convinced the other agencies in Korea are that awesome in their treatment of their artists either, and one step up from crap is still crap.
Nice to see they're willing to make a settlement, but I basically think DBSK are still screwed. :/ Maybe if the offer for settlement had come at the beginning of all the drama there'd be a chance, but there's been too much mud-slinging on all sides of this mess for things to ever settle down now.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:44 pm (UTC)This.
♥
And sadly I agree with the last part as well.
T.T
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:27 pm (UTC)Ngl, I still dream of this to happen. :(
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:25 pm (UTC)If SM's desires for a settlement are sincere, then I will talk to the three members and will report back to the Courts.
I'm looking forward for more progress on this case. /popcorn.gif 8D
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:30 pm (UTC)Meaning - OT5 has imploded ;_;
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:49 pm (UTC);~;
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:32 pm (UTC)but why should they go back to the dungeon when they have seen the light and tasted the sweetness of freedom.
SM should have dealt with this last year but itz late already
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:45 pm (UTC)I don't know what to feel anymore.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-08 02:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 08:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 06:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 06:28 pm (UTC)because i agree totally~~
/not a stalker. i just have good memories. LOL.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:51 pm (UTC)i dun think they'll ever be as big as the DBSK they were if they're not managed under SM. seriouslyy... solo, or group project with just the 3 of them.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 04:20 pm (UTC)i am so going to get death threats for saying this, but they would not have come as far as they did without it being all five of them, managed under SM (and Avex). I really really love them all but I don't think solo careers or unit careers are going to turn out well for them. There was something magical about them when they were all together. TVXQ really was more than a sum of it's parts. It's going to be sad to watch JaeChunSu struggle to hold onto their careers in Japan as the public interest slowly ebbs away.
*prepares for rotten tomatoes being thrown*
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 03:54 pm (UTC)Just want the 5 boys together again and I don't mind if they're in different companies or different countries, I just want to see them meeting up, happy, smiling and together.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 04:12 pm (UTC)Just want them not losing their brotherhood.
Heck, i can accept no tvxq, but i want ot5 in private!
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 04:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-08 04:51 am (UTC)this sfm.
no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 04:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 04:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-05-07 04:48 pm (UTC)seriously both sides wont be able to forgive and forget THAT easily so its kinda impossible to carry on working together imo...
i just hope the 5 remain as friends :|
more shit is gg to come up and im waiting for the courts to shoot themselves in the leg by favouring SM in the end... cos big corporations win such cases most of the time...