[identity profile] kyokomurasaki.livejournal.com posting in [community profile] omonatheydid
T.O.P, a member of a K-pop boy group Big Bang, has been lighting up local headlines for… well, lighting up. He is being charged by South Korean prosecutors for smoking marijuana. Many people want him punished for this “indecent” behavior — according to South Korean law, he could face up to five years in prison or pay a 50 million won (44,500 U.S. dollar) fine.

News of T.O.P.’s subsequent hospitalization after overdosing on prescription tranquilizers didn’t win him much public sympathy. While lying in a state of severe lethargy in an intensive care unit, he was dishonorably discharged from the conscript police force.

But believe it or not, half a century ago this very act of “indecency” would have been as innocuous as smoking a cigarette in South Korea. It was Park Chung-hee, the recently ousted Park Geun-hye’s father and South Korea’s longest-reigning military dictator (1961-1979), who blazed the country’s path to demonizing marijuana.

For thousands of years, hemp plant — known locally as daema — grew on Korean soil. The crop was versatile, used to make ropes, nets and a coarse, ivory-colored fabric called sambe. Its seeds were used as a laxative in traditional medicine. This lucrative plant grew easily in the wild, and Korea’s Japanese occupiers encouraged its cultivation during the colonial period (officially 1910-1945). Whether it was smoked recreationally at that time is unclear.

The Narcotics Act was enacted in 1957 under the Rhee Syngman administration, South Korea’s first government after liberation from Japan. Marijuana (cannabis sativa L, also called “Indian marijuana”), along with poppies, opium and cocaine, was designated a forbidden narcotic — possibly due to the anti-marijuana sentiment that Harry Salinger, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Federal Bureau of Narcotics’ first commander, encouraged from the 1930s.

But the act specifically forbid “Indian marijuana” as a narcotic. Korean-grown weed was still free. It wasn’t until the 1960s that people began to question whether the species that grew on Korean soil — cannabis sativa — also had THC, the primary psychoactive found in cannabis.

In the 1960s, smoking daemacho (marijuana) came under the spotlight with the arrival of Western hippie culture. Soldiers at U.S. military bases around South Korea were found smoking marijuana, including that of Korean produce.

Soon, smoking marijuana — or “happy smoke,” the chosen nomenclature at that time — was in vogue among young South Koreans who followed the latest trends. Popular musicians were among the first to experiment with and publicize “happy smoke.” Shin Joong-hyun, often called the godfather of South Korean rock, wrote a long, descriptive article about his “happy smoke” experience in Sunday Seoul magazine in 1973. (Two years later, he would be arrested and imprisoned for four months for smoking pot.)

Park Gwang-soo, a singer who formed a band with Shin, told daily newspaper Hankyoreh in 2005 that he used to smoke marijuana on the streets in the late 1960s.

“[Offering marijuana] was no different from saying ‘let’s grab a drink.’ There was no reason to feel guilty [for smoking marijuana],” Park said.

But military dictator Park Chung-hee, who had seized power in a 1961 coup, strove to control every corner of culture. His regime imposed curfews and regulations on hairstyles, outfits and even white rice consumption; censorship and control over various forms of entertainment were also common.

Park’s Broadcasting Ethics Commission was set up to censor popular songs perceived to be noxious to the people and the country. Ambiguous guidelines were set up to censor anything that the regime felt was subversive to its authority. From numbers that “may undermine the nation’s dignity” to those that “may sully the social climate,” nearly 800 popular songs were banned from both broadcast and live performance. The iconic protest song, “Morning Dew,” sung at last year’s candlelight demonstrations that called for the ouster of Park’s daughter, was also one of the banned numbers.

Simultaneously, the government distributed massive self-propaganda. From the early 1970s, the official song of Park Chung-hee’s most famous socioeconomic campaign, the New Village Movement, echoed through the streets day and night to inspire the people to engage in the modernization of rural villages. (Apparently, Park himself wrote the song.)

Unlike these supposedly invigorating songs that served the nation’s interests, pop music seemed unhelpful, if not menacing to South Korean decency and morality. As “happy smoke” was associated with insurgent youth culture abroad (i.e. hippies and antiwar movements), Park grew wary of its potential effects at home. Nixon’s declaration of the “War on Drugs” in 1971, which some saw as a war against the anti-war sentiment among the left, may well have inspired Park to take action.

To clamp down on marijuana use, Park needed scapegoats. And pop icons were the perfect fit: Smoking weed was common among popular South Korean entertainers who performed often near U.S. military bases, a hotspot of entertainment at the time. Besides, these stars had a fervent following among the young, which meant cracking down on them would send a powerful message to the youth.

In the winter of 1975, three years after his so-called Yushin Reforms — Park Chung-hee’s draconian consolidation of presidential power through constitutional upheavals — there was a major marijuana crackdown that involved over 50 well-known South Korean entertainers, including rockstar Shin Joong-hyun, whom the press blasted as “the daemacho ringleader.”

These celebrities suffered unlawful arrests and torture, both common practices under the dictatorship. Some, like “ringleader” Shin, were thrust into prisons and mental hospitals for months. After their release, they were banned from performing, which mattered little, as their reputation had already been tarnished by their involvement in the “decadent” activity of smoking weed, as Park framed it.

“At this grave juncture that will determine life or death in our fight against the communists, daemacho smoking by young people is ruining our country,” Park said in early 1976. He ordered that marijuana smokers be weeded out through application of the heaviest punishment available by law: the death penalty (although nobody received it).

Less than a year after the major crackdown on the daemacho smoking celebrities, in 1976, the Cannabis Control Act came into being. It outlawed not only the smoking and possession of marijuana in general (no longer specifying just the “Indian marijuana”), but also imposing strict regulations on all aspects of the hemp industry.

Bombarding the general public with negative publicity about daemacho during the 1975 marijuana crackdown and the passing of the cannabis law proved the perfect recipe for demonizing daemacho.

South Koreans have traditionally been wary of substance abuse in general (but definitely more liberal toward alcohol and nicotine). Narcotics were often framed by pre-Park Chung-hee government authorities as both vestiges of Japanese colonial rule and North Korean tactics to perturb the country. As long as daemacho was legally categorized as a narcotic, it was easy to convince the people how decadent and nefarious it was.

In the last four decades since the passing of the Cannabis Control Act, many celebrities and citizens have been prosecuted and publicly shamed for smoking weed, be it in and outside South Korea. Fingers are pointed, heads are shaken; fears spread that the moral fiber of the country may be dissolving.

But it’s easy to overlook the fact that the demonization of daemacho was the brainchild of Park Chung-hee, backed by political propaganda and a media that followed suit.

To most South Koreans, marijuana is on the same level of taboo as a hard drug like heroin or crystal meth. Not a lot of discussion takes place on what marijuana actually is; how it can be used in a variety of ways, not just to get high, and whether smoking it seriously harms the smoker’s health (compared to, for example, the copious amounts of soju that South Koreans consume every year).

The stigma surrounding marijuana creates fear — without productive discussion or accurate information — that the substance is addictive and dangerous, making smokers hallucinate and even sexually aggressive. (Which is partly why, when T.O.P made news for having smoked daemacho with a girl, many netizens speculated about a sexual liaison.)

South Koreans still shun anything that is labelled generally as a narcotic, and the taboo surrounding marijuana has been powerful enough a drug on its populace to incite unilaterally negative public sentiment and stigmatize its perpetrators. Smoking weed isn’t just a legal violation; it’s a moral violation. While K-pop superstar T.O.P seems to be the latest protagonist in South Korea’s pot scare, he will most certainly not be the last.


Source: Korea Expose


I thought this was pretty informative and might help shed some light on how marijuana use came to be treated how it is in Korea today. There are more videos and links in the source article if anyone wants to check those out.

Date: 2017-06-12 06:53 pm (UTC)
krissasaur: (+Oh My Girl: YooA ▬▬▬ Omona!)
From: [personal profile] krissasaur
Thanks for sharing such a great read. Also, I now feel even more confused how that lady was ever elected. I know her father was apparently favored, BUT HOW.

Date: 2017-06-12 09:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cutesanslee.livejournal.com
I think part of it is selective memory, you know despite all the crazy things Park Chung-hee did (reforms, arresting enemies, becoming a dictator and all by supressing democratic movements), he is credited with Korea's rapid economic growth in the post-Korean war period, and to an extent this was the groundwork for the modern Korea's economy. Though its still important not to forget the price that regular koreans paid for his economic policies.

Another example (from my one of my home countries) is the current Nigerian president. He came into power after a coup in the 1980s and was known for being incredibly harsh on corruption and all types of public indiscipline. He ofc was ousted by another coup. But 2 years ago he was re-elected, because many hoped he would be useful against the corruption we have in Nigeria today. But so far, he has been ineffective.

Date: 2017-06-13 12:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tjmok125.livejournal.com
It's very similar in my opinion to the sentiments on Mao in China. Many of the things he did to his own people were treacherous and disgusting but he also helped China in a time when they needed it most. Most elders I talk to reminisce about the days when they had little to eat and barely a pot to piss in because they said despite that it was happy, they were no longer in wars and everyone was the same. It's why now people have deep sentimental memories of him and his era.

Date: 2017-06-12 11:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] chomsky.livejournal.com
It's not uncommon that dictators are also popular figures for the positives that often times accompany the negatives of their dictatorship. In Panama, Omar Torrijos was a super popular guy despite not allowing free elections for 13 years and very much acting as a dictator despite never have officially ascended to the role of Panamanian head of state. He was also assassinated, and his son, Martin Torrijos, was president of Panama for five years in the 2000s.

I don't know that I'd put them on the same level of the Parks (as I'm neither Panamanian nor Korean) but yeah, this history isn't unique, and I think in a lot of situations, leaders become MORE beloved when they're assassinated.
Edited Date: 2017-06-12 11:57 pm (UTC)

Date: 2017-06-12 07:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gathyou.livejournal.com
Thank you for sharing, it was really insightful.

Date: 2017-06-12 08:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zui-circus.livejournal.com
Great article.

Date: 2017-06-12 08:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_clochette_/
thank you OP for sharing! I just skimmed for now but I am looking forward to reading the whole piece.

while in SK there are obviously more facets to the story, I think a lot of people forget that in many countries the history of illicit (particularly addictive) drugs is still very much tied up with the history of colonialism and/or imperialism, under which many countries were ravaged by the production and use of various drugs, and the continued use of many of these countries as drug trafficking corridors.

Date: 2017-06-12 09:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miyozari.livejournal.com
mte

i randomly showed ysl's perfume "opium" to my chinese classmate and she was immediately turned off by it and bluntly said the english ruined her country with opium. i felt immediately bad for my blunder. evidently, she doesn't think too highly of drugs (no matter which one).

Date: 2017-06-12 09:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miyozari.livejournal.com
i don't understand ysl's stance on this matter and w/e is going on in their marketing department. another perfume called "black opium" was released last year. at this point, they're just being purposefully ignorant and shameless.
Edited Date: 2017-06-12 09:37 pm (UTC)

Date: 2017-06-12 09:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_clochette_/
it was horrifying a few years ago when the met gala theme was "china" and the whole event was sponsored by YSL. so many people (including anna wintour) showed up wearing poppies or poppy-inspired looks. it was super tasteless.

Date: 2017-06-12 10:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] miyozari.livejournal.com
that met gala was probably the worst one in recent years. i think only rihanna and a few handful more showed up in dresses which matched the theme in a respectful and beautiful manner.

Date: 2017-06-12 09:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] http://users.livejournal.com/_clochette_/
I am reminded of when the then-UK prime minister wore and members of his delegation wore remembrance day red poppies on their lapels on a state visit to china and were asked to remove them.
Edited Date: 2017-06-12 09:43 pm (UTC)

Date: 2017-06-12 08:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] neoreulwonhae.livejournal.com
I wonder how long it will take for Koreans to stop being sheep and start thinking for themselves about these things. To think pot is on the same level as cocaine or meth is...so asinine.

Date: 2017-06-12 08:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mmmalvina.livejournal.com
huh, this was interesting. although i still don't get the criticism of sk's current stand on drugs. i keep reading all these "omg they judge drug users" and "omg they treat all drugs the same", and the only thing on my mind is: cry some more. idk why some people think top's alleged mental health issues should change everything either. it IS a cultural issue, after all.

Date: 2017-06-12 11:21 pm (UTC)

Date: 2017-06-13 03:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jyusou.livejournal.com
ngl, i tend to think the same

Date: 2017-06-12 09:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hibaalhadid.livejournal.com
Thank you for sharing, an eye opening piece

Date: 2017-06-12 09:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dirkismyhomeboy.livejournal.com
Fucking Richard Nixon.

Date: 2017-06-13 12:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lightframes.livejournal.com
All that needs to be said on several issues.

Date: 2017-06-12 10:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thranduiles.livejournal.com
thanks for the article op, it was really interesting

Date: 2017-06-12 10:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] yixingsforehead.livejournal.com
i also found it really interesting.

also shoutout to my korean friend who kept on asking for coffee shops in amsterdam even when he knew what it meant in dutch, and knew he did not want the green stuff sold in there.

Date: 2017-06-12 11:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ashdevilrun23.livejournal.com
Thank you for this opportunity! I'm always ready to learn more about Korean history I still don't get why that lady was elected when her father was so....bad yikes

Date: 2017-06-13 01:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jaelissi.livejournal.com
News of T.O.P.’s subsequent hospitalization after overdosing on prescription tranquilizers didn’t win him much public sympathy. While lying in a state of severe lethargy in an intensive care unit, he was dishonorably discharged from the conscript police force.

As far as I remember, the overdose was subsequent to his dishonorable discharge from the police force

Date: 2017-06-13 05:25 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] soyunatetera.livejournal.com
In my country there's also a lot of the culture and social norms that's been inherited since the dictatorship we lived, and it's been maintained and justifies for decades already, and even if in recent years it's been discused and questioned still is so hard to change things because of all the obstacles that the same regime left... it's frustrating yes, the people that suffer the most about the consecuenses of this history is ourselves, I wish we could just say fuck it and leave it behind, move forward, but even if there has formed somewhat a consensus over the many negatives aspects of what the dictatorship left us, still is really REALLY hard to change them in a fluid manner, because we're talking about a culture that's been mantained for many decades.
I know it must be difficult to understand for people from countries that haven't had dictatorships in their countries recent histories, and be like Why don't they think about it and change all this bad stuff? well guess what that's a big trauma like a fucking dictatorship leaves to a culture of a country

Date: 2022-03-25 11:20 pm (UTC)

Profile

omonatheydid: (Default)
omonatheymoved

March 2022

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 2026-03-03 07:46 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios