
On August 20, Sulli posted a photo on her Instagram of her and (Netizen's talented fave ex-Kara member) Goo Hara in a large pink “Johnson’s baby oil” t-shirt. She wrote, “Friendship photo with Hara. Hara that I love.” The photo appears to be taken by Korea's own Terry Richardson, Rotta. Knetz are not happy because of the Lolita themes the picture portrays.
1. [+1,551, -57] Our country still doesn't realize how big of a problem lolita is. While we're quick to get angry over child sex crimes and criminals like Jo Do Soon, we still allow pictures with concepts like this to be taken.
2. [+1,425, -61] Lolita is a crime and it should be punished. Restrictions need to be placed.
3. [+1,330, -47] Lolita is not a personal preference but a crime. There are so many child sex crimes already, you can't possibly think this picture is okay. The only ones made victim will be the children ㅡㅡ
4. [+138, -6] I think Johnson's is going to sue them ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
5. [+120, -8] There is definitely a problem here. You really can't shield them just for being pretty faces. Lolita is something that should not be allowed at all and I support this boycott fully.
6. [+100, -5] Nevermind this crime talk, Sulli just has issues with her head in general
7. [+85, -3] I agree with the best replies. With sex crimes against children running rampant already, you honestly can't consider lolita as a personal preference anymore.
8. [+83, -3] Rotta is just as responsible and problematic for taking these photos
9. [+67, -2] All this fuss over two b*tches who can't use their brains for once
10. [+53, -2] We need to start by taking down that pathetic Rotta
Johnson & Johnson, the company behind the product, has spoken up about the controversial photo after netizens notified the company about the photo. They wrote, “Thank you very much for reaching out to us with your concerns. We at Johnson’s do not condone the objectification of any persons, and appreciate your flagging this misrepresentation of our brand. Please know that we do not take any such incidents lightly and have flagged this issue to our management teams for review and action. Once again, we appreciate your support in reporting the issue, and helping us maintain the values we hold dear.”
Soompi: 1 via naver jelly_jilli & 2 via topstarnews, netizenbuzz via nate
no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 10:38 am (UTC)That photo is unsettling
no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 10:42 am (UTC)But that being said, her friendship with Rotta is uncomfortable to say the least, and she is really playing into this disgusting lolita schtick... especially when she works with him.
This is deeper than "Sulli doing something non-conservative that k-netz don't like", it's a complete sexualisation of child-like imagery and situations.
no subject
Date: 2016-08-25 12:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 10:49 am (UTC)yikes. just like how i judge ppl who work willingly with terry richardson, i judge ppl who work willingly with rotta. this shit isn't cute, it's disturbing imo. rotta's a major pos idek why anyone would think his work is art
no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 11:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 11:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 11:20 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 11:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-08-25 12:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 11:26 am (UTC)girlgroups have or has had a lolita concepts
no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 12:05 pm (UTC)Anyway people are capable of caring about more than one issue at the same time, just because all these people are criticizing Sulli, it doesnt mean they all dont see anything wrong with gross concepts, thats another and completely different discussion to have. Why do you assume whole korea doesnt give a shit unlike oh so enlightened ifandom, just because now they talk about Sulli.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 11:30 am (UTC)The thing is,with Terry involved,this is very intentional. The concept is exactly what you think it is and the use of two Asian girls to convey this disgusting theme was on purpose.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 11:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 11:57 am (UTC)As long as people don't understand that infantilizing grown women (like Sulli and Hara) and sexualising actual children is sick and disgusting, nothing will change.
As long as the whole world literally tells women, that we've to stay young and childlike as long as possible to be seen as desirable (shave your whole body, use anti-aging products or get botox injections because saggy skin on women is ugly,...), nothing will change.
Sorry, this is a bit of a rant. I haven't sleeped in three days...~.~
no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 12:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 11:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 12:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 11:58 am (UTC)What I do find fascinating is how most of the heat is aimed at Sulli. The responses I've seen it's like Hara doesn't exist. Criticizing this concept/photographer is totally fair game. But the hyper-focus on Sulli looks more like a vendetta against an 'untamed' woman. This bothers me.
Were any of these netizens even aware of this problem before IU's 23 MV? She was obviously making a direct commentary on how she had been portrayed this way and how frustrating it was... and it seemed to suddenly enlighten everyone to the issue, but not enough for them to see she was shitting on it.
So, what's the deal? It's only a problem if it's done by artists that it's popular to hate on?
It's totally okay if done by your fave or by the 'pristine' lady idols who stay in their lane?
I'd appreciate people expressing concern and criticism more if there was some integrity shown towards what the root of the problem actually is. Exploiting it as an opportunity to shit on a specific idol they don't like is very telling.
no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 03:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 12:06 pm (UTC)the photo didn't look that sketchy to me at first but the context and the photographer's other works are definitely damning
no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 12:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 12:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 12:38 pm (UTC)this was not surprising from sulli but i'm pretty disappointed to see hara in this :/
not enough :/ :/ :/
:/ :/ :/
no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 12:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 01:22 pm (UTC)"stop misunderstanding"
like, really????????
no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 01:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 01:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 02:08 pm (UTC)also his statement about the pictures of japanese children was something along the lines of him getting permission from their families, but i heavily doubt they would have agreed to this if they had seen his other work. so gross.
no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 02:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 02:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 02:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 02:32 pm (UTC)but also yikes @ knetz blaming sulli for all of this while kpop has been doing lolita concepts for ages and they're hardly a complaint about that? + stop overlooking/shaming girl groups who are comfortable with their sexuality
no subject
Date: 2016-08-24 02:54 pm (UTC)