
On the morning of August 19, Luhan’s and SM Entertainment’s legal representatives, Hankyul and BKL, respectively, met for their first court date, since the lawsuit to verify the invalidity of Luhan’s contract with SM was first filed in October of last year.
Regarding the grounds for the suit, Luhan’s camp states, “The lawsuit was filed due to an unfair contract. We also filed an additional suit for SM’s embezzlement and professional negligence.” According to Luhan’s representative, the investigation by the prosecution has ended, and what is left is a decision on the possibility of indictment.
The head judge then said that he heard SM wanted a peaceful resolution, to which SM’s side agreed. However, Luhan’s rep said, “I’m not sure what is meant by a peaceful resolution.”
The head judge inquired, “Isn’t the 30 million won (approx. 25,000 USD) [requested in the lawsuit] the main issue? The judge panel feels that a contract nullification for that is too much.”
Luhan’s side then explained that Luhan did not once receive a proper pay stub for over two years.
SM responded to the claim, stating that it wasn’t a situation where the profits were abundant, and that because Luhan is the one who signed the contract, he knew his earnings. “And Luhan knew that he hadn’t been able to yield benefits in the company yet, and his income wasn’t something that was important to him at the time.”
Luhan’s side shot back that regardless of being in the green or red, a detailed statement should be given, but none were received for two years. “That’s an undeniable violation of the contract. While statements were always requested, it was always pushed back under the reasoning that they had no time. Following, what we want is to receive proper statements and proper payment.”
His side further claimed that despite working nonstop with music, appearances in shows, dramas, and ads, all Luhan received was 10 million won (approx. 8,400 USD), and because they have no documents to verify this, they do not know if what they received is correct or not.
SM went on to dispute the embezzlement claim made by Luhan’s rep, saying that accusing the company of embezzlement because of a payment dispute is not right.
In the end, the judge panel proposed another mediation, to which both sides agreed. The date has been set for September 14.
Source: Soompi via Nate
no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 05:23 am (UTC)SM is still trying to drag this out by claiming NOW they want to try a peaceful resolution...ugh
Kris' first court date is next month and he brought the pay issue from day one of his lawsuit so the fact SM still doesn't have any paperwork is shady as hell
no subject
Date: 2015-08-21 10:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 05:29 am (UTC)illegal wage garnishment is more likely to stick
no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 05:30 am (UTC)Nah blud there's something wrong here.
I'm also looking at AKP (i know, ew, but only soompi and akp have posted on this) and they're saying that the courts are suggesting SM to lower the contract years or the contract termination fee or stuff about the distribution of the profits and SM's basically like "the other members haven't complained about profit distribution or anything!!!! only he has!!! ur accusations are totally false!!!!!!" but they won't release documents that prove Luhan and his reps's accusations wrong or atleast backup their own argument.
Anyway, I found this in my psd folder and I figure it's pretty appropriate~
EDIT: OP, some translators are translating other articles regarding the court case from Korean to Chinese to English.
(cr. ludeerstar)
(cr. shuaijerks (http://shuaijerks.tumblr.com/post/127062665223))
Fuck SM and their greedy asses--Luhan & co shouldn't even be offering them 10% of his earnings until 2019, let alone a fart to fucking sniff at. I'm happy things are looking favorable for Luhan but I'm worried SM will pull some shit just to say that their illegal 10 year contract is legal because Luhan's doing foreign activities.
I wonder what shit they'll pull on Kris, come September 2nd tbh
no subject
Date: 2015-08-20 03:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 05:35 am (UTC)every new thing that comes out just exposes more and more how terrible sm is and im here for all of this JUICE
no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 06:26 am (UTC)PLS DON'T PUT THAT IDEA INTO MY HEAD. I ALREADY HATE SM SFM AS IT IS I DON'T NEED THIS MY POOR M BABIES TT______TT
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 05:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 08:43 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 05:39 am (UTC)They really should just let the EXO-M members free.
no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 05:47 am (UTC)When they say two years do they mean up until before Overdose or also during all of 2014? I'm assuming the former in which case I can kind of see why only $8K all things considered BUT SM has no excuse to be giving their artists so little of the pie. Their operating expenses are so low they can afford raises.
no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 07:47 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 05:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 05:56 am (UTC)I wonder if Lay and the rest of EXO are -really- doing well and getting a proper paycheck, considering the individual activities they are doing aside from being in EXO.
no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 06:06 am (UTC)is sm trying to say that exo isn't making them money....
no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 06:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 06:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 06:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 06:28 am (UTC).....................you're still obliged to pay them
no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 06:38 am (UTC)it might be a cultural thing as well, since i can relate, saying "no, it's okay not to get paid much" when i'm doing freelance work. there's always the humility factor involved. but even so, i've had family/friends who have insisted to pay me for doing work -- and that is the right thing to do. (but then i insist on giving them discounts lol)
in the case of luhan vs sm though, bringing up that money wasn't important to him is stupid, because he was an employee who trained and signed the company's contract, and as such should be given proper wages. he wasn't a freelancer.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 06:28 am (UTC)also wtf is the head judge even saying, how can he shield sment and listen to their requests but not lu han's side when they're the ones lacking solid evidence that the prosecution requested. where's the goddamn warrant for a search and seizure. what is korea's legal system even doing. goddAMN.
no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 06:41 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 06:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 06:38 am (UTC)I read that in a bitchy tone.
no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 12:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 06:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 07:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 07:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 08:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 07:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 07:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 08:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 08:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 12:57 pm (UTC)That's real by the way
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2015-08-19 08:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-08-20 12:43 am (UTC)