
SM Entertainment is being accused of plagiarizing EXO’s recent teaser video after a Swedish graphic designer noted that they have used graphics by him and two other graphic designers without permission.
Graphic designer Erik Söderberg shared a post pointing out the similarities on his Tumblr on January 14. The post was originally started by the user orisonofkyungsoo on December 5. The post shows a comparison between graphic art by Erik Söderberg and two other international designers – Carlo Vega and Alexander Nusic – and graphics that appear on EXO’s teaser video titled “EXO 2015 COMING SOON.” The teaser video first aired during the 2014 Mnet Asian Music Awards on December 3, and was uploaded on YouTube soon after the live broadcast.

Currently, the original teaser video on SMTOWN‘s account cannot be accessed “due to a copyright claim by eriksoderberg.se.”

The video can still be found on other YouTube channels, however.
SM Entertainment has yet to respond to the accusations.
UPDATE:
A Twitter user recently asked Erik Söderberg why he blocked EXO’s video, to which the designer responded that the video contains work used without permission, and that while he and “at least one more artist” contacted SM, he ended up having to contact YouTube directly when no action was taken by the agency. Overall, the exchanged remained extremely positive, the Twitter use thanking Erik Söderberg, who in turn apologizes if he upset any EXO fans.

Source: Erik Soderberg's Blog, KMusic-Live, Erik Soderberg's Twitter
Via: Soompi
no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 03:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 03:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 03:21 pm (UTC)http://osen.mt.co.kr/article/G1110053748
my theory is that Sodersberg wasn't aware that VM Production was doing the work under SM, and thought SM plagiarized his works, when in reality SM and VM production had a contract.
So SM didn't completely screw up, VM production and Sodersberg just didn't have enough communication on what this was gonna be for.
no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 03:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 03:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 08:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 03:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 03:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 04:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 04:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 05:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 03:29 pm (UTC)They are a huge company and have huge audience, do they really think you can get away with shit like this? Sometimes it makes me think that the company demand their staff to create something amazing in too little time, so that they're almost driven to go "the easy way".
no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 03:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 03:56 pm (UTC)Get it together kpop.
no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 03:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 04:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 05:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 04:08 pm (UTC)Messy
no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 04:16 pm (UTC)As a designer, this is supremely upsetting, and I'm glad Erik is fighting back. If I still had any respect for this company, it's all gone now.
no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 04:46 pm (UTC)SM(essy) strikes again. You can definitely see the similarities. Just pay the artists and keep it moving ffs.
no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 08:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-15 03:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 04:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 04:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-16 12:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 04:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 05:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 05:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 05:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 07:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 07:42 pm (UTC)Or is it "just scroll to the bottom and jump on SM-hate bandwagon"?
no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 08:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 09:02 pm (UTC)But I was more referring to the SM hate (with all of those lawsuits and scandals it saw last year), hence why I edited my comment to say 'hate' instead of 'plagiarism' lol
no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 09:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 09:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 11:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-15 04:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-15 06:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-14 11:44 pm (UTC)1. not pay him in a timely manner
2. throw money at the problem after it was discovered
3. not clearly inform him what his work was for (+pay issues?)
I know in Hollywood, people are often paid 6 months+ after for their work.
no subject
Date: 2015-01-15 01:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-15 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-15 05:57 pm (UTC)It's something like many east asian countries only wants to talk with the 'biggest' in the company and those under doesn't really matter even though somebody 'lower' might be responsible for what they want
could be the case or just that he was paid after