![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
imienazwisko.livejournal.com posting in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
omonatheydid
Rain will be strongly confronting rumors regarding nude photos.
On November 13, a photo of a nude man began circulating online. The netizen, who spread the picture, explained that it was a nude photo of Rain that was leaked out of Kim Tae Hee′s cellphone. Regarding this, Rain′s agency has stated that it was completely false.
Rain′s legal representative, Kim Nam Hong, told Newsen on November 13, "We′ll be filing a complaint sometime today or tomorrow. This is completely false."
"We don′t know with what intention it was released. At first, we thought it was something to laugh over, but a surprising number of people actually believed it was Rain. We thought that everyone would dismiss the photos, but it′s actually becoming a problem. It′s a problem because people in Japan and China will also look at it, and many believe it′s from Kim Tae Hee′s cellphone."
The lawyer continued, "It is a very childish act. We believe that [the netizen] is doing it on purpose to raise credibility. [The netizen] even added, ′I hope it′s not.′ That seems even more malicious to us."
"If you don′t blur out the eyes in the picture, it′s clear that it′s not Rain, but we′ve come to the conclusion that the eyes were covered up on purpose. The person doesn′t have the skill to photoshop a picture, so [the netizen] cleverly hid the eyes. We were going to overlook the issue at first, but we decided to strongly confront this issue after believing that it was done out of malice."
(op's not sure if it's right to include it)
HERE
source: mwave, cloudzoa
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2014-11-13 03:53 pm (UTC)Probably means they'll be more proactive in the future too
*edit* I just read the comments...I don't see a photo? The photo was here? That's not...appropriate but I'm glad it's been fixed. Let's not do that in the future.
no subject
Date: 2014-11-13 04:17 pm (UTC)Koreaboo never posted the picture, so i was wondering if it could've looked that similar to Rain and they kind of do, tbf.
no subject
Date: 2014-11-13 04:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-11-13 04:25 pm (UTC)2014 keeps it coming, istg.
no subject
Date: 2014-11-13 04:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-11-13 04:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-11-13 04:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-11-13 06:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-11-13 08:05 pm (UTC)me doesn't everybody....
no subject
Date: 2014-11-13 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-11-13 04:54 pm (UTC)Fuck double standards, it's still an invasion of privacy.
no subject
Date: 2014-11-13 06:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:hmm can't tell if fully erect or not
Date: 2014-11-13 05:07 pm (UTC)lemme take a closer look...he maybe a hanger...cause its not hanging like a grower...
I'am an observant perv...and IDGAF!
Im happy to see he doesn't skip leg day...he's a keeper in the sheets!!
Would love to see So ji sub naked though...
Re: hmm can't tell if fully erect or not
Date: 2014-11-13 05:12 pm (UTC)Re: hmm can't tell if fully erect or not
From:Re: hmm can't tell if fully erect or not
From:Re: hmm can't tell if fully erect or not
From:The uncensored pic was not bad, not at all
Date: 2014-11-13 05:11 pm (UTC)Re: The uncensored pic was not bad, not at all
Date: 2014-11-13 06:14 pm (UTC)Re: The uncensored pic was not bad, not at all
From:Re: The uncensored pic was not bad, not at all
From:Re: The uncensored pic was not bad, not at all
From:no subject
Date: 2014-11-13 05:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-11-13 05:52 pm (UTC)If he wants to truly prove it's not him, he's going to have to post real nude photos so we can compare and make sure... for science.
no subject
Date: 2014-11-13 06:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-11-13 06:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-11-13 06:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-11-13 06:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-11-13 07:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-11-13 06:45 pm (UTC)now I want uncensored pic!
no subject
Date: 2014-11-13 07:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-11-13 11:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-11-13 11:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-11-13 11:31 pm (UTC)http://dateforsuju.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/rain-shirtless-showing-6-pack-abs.jpg His most buff for ninja assassin
https://cloudusa.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/753e36dejw1diizrjeyaxj.jpg less uff probably normal fit Bi
http://swoonworthy.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/bi-rain-shirtless.jpg buff and large Bi, probably working out but with a diet that isn't going to get him cut like his terrible ninja assassin one did.
http://cdn10.mixrmedia.com/user_photos/blog/2014/01/05/32b309a687e1bf7fe1dde44fee2c0235-500.jpg Bi for his last comeback.
Now if we look at the male in this picture the GLARING flaw is the pretty much tennis ball cut in the middle of his chest. It's a little more common in older fit men to have less definition there but unless something changed in the last year his muscles are not as defined as this gentleman's and that large cut in the middle of his pecs is not near as deep on Bi. Bi is my serious man crush, and I don't think this leaked photo is him, I also think if you didn't blank out the eyes it wouldn't look enough like him and that's why they picked that, and only that. If the face was completely mosaic-ed out I would believe it more than this one, but I don't think this is Bi, the body just doesn't match where he's at, even with his weight loss for his last roll I really doubt this is what his body currently looks like.
If it is him tho that sucks man.
no subject
Date: 2014-11-13 11:46 pm (UTC)I think it's him.
no subject
Date: 2014-11-14 04:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-11-14 02:35 pm (UTC)