
Back in 2008, in the dark days before 1080p YouTube videos, I watched Girls’ Generation’s “Kissing You” video for the first time. I didn’t know the group, let alone care about them—I was a new Super Junior fan eager to watch Donghae’s cameo—but the cheesy sets and fairy-tale outfits quickly won me over. After years of choosing to listen to all-male bands, it was refreshing to see and hear girls my age that I could relate to. By the time “Genie” came out, I was a full-fledged superfan.
It didn’t take me long to find out that being a girl group fan—or a fan of any female artist in the K-Pop world—was vastly different than supporting a male group. While the pelvic thrusts and shirt-ripping of male groups like Big Bang and 2PM were lauded in the online K-Pop communities I frequented, “Genie” drew criticism for having a “simple” dance designed to show off SNSD’s legs. When “Oh!” came out six months later, the girls were suddenly “too infantile.” Instead of having fun, I spent most of my early fandom days on the defensive.
In this way, being a socially conscious fan of female artists reflects, on a smaller scale, the experience of being a woman in modern society—constantly defending yourself and others from sexist criticism while fighting for your voice and place in the world. Last decade, I didn’t yet have the vocabulary or education to dissect the misogyny in K-Pop and its fandom. I do now. The standards and fandom attitudes surrounding female Korean artists are undeniably harmful—and easy to expose.
The Feminist Question
While feminism itself is still a controversial concept, as the dozens of female celebrities renouncing it demonstrate, watered-down messages of female empowerment are gaining traction in global pop culture. Companies such as Dove, Nike, and Pantene have challenged sexist ideas and promoted body acceptance in their advertising, but women writers have posed an important question: Are these messages still progressive when delivered through largely male-controlled corporations to make money? If Dove’s sister companies use sexist advertising and Nike exploits Asian women for cheap labor, does it matter if they tell some women to love themselves?
Similar questions take center stage in discussions of feminism among female artists in K-Pop. Can we truly hail female artists as progressive when men control so much of their image and product? Is it feminist to sing about love? With cultural appropriation and colorism so rampant in K-Pop, is it possible to be progressive at all?
These are important, difficult questions, and this discussion can’t and shouldn’t be limited to this article. The cultural appropriation seen in videos like CL’s “The Baddest Female” and T-ara’s “YaYaYa” can’t be ignored, and neither can the blackface and mocking of dark skin by men and women alike on variety shows. For example, in the video below, Yuri of Girls' Generation is mocked for having darker skin as a differentiator from her other members.
Are there songs, videos, and even performers that aren’t feminist in K-Pop? Definitely. Too many videos show makeovers involving dramatic weight loss, extensive makeup, or cosmetic surgery as a way to raise self-esteem or get a boyfriend, Hyomin’s fat-shaming “Nice Body” being just the most recent. Other videos encourage girls to fight over men, and even miss A’s “I Don’t Need A Man” shames “other girls” who don’t earn their own money. But there are still glimmers of progress that deserve our attention.
It’s still true that Korean entertainment companies are widely controlled by men, some of whom, like Open World Entertainment’s infamous CEO, exploit their female artists and trainees. Many of the industry’s top composers, including Shinsadong Tiger, Brave Brothers, Teddy, and JYP, are men. Even in this male-dominated industry, however, there are women making their voices heard. Like their male counterparts, idols such as IU, CL, SPICA, and SNSD are receiving opportunities to compose and write their own music. Kenzie has worked under SM Entertainment for over a decade, writing dozens of their hit songs and “One More Chance”, an underappreciated but undeniably feminist track promoted by The Grace’s Dana and Sunday. There’s also Kim Eana, a lyricist who’s worked on almost all of IU and Brown Eyed Girls’ most recent hits, as well as Ga-in’s “Irreversible” and “Bloom.” Many of these female-written songs, of course, are about heteronormative love, but they’re about love and sexuality from a woman’s point of view—a perspective pop culture sorely lacks.
The abundance of girl groups in K-Pop also provides a venue to celebrate female friendship, something our society doesn’t do nearly enough. Whether it’s the loving birthday messages members write one another on social media, the hugs and cakes groups share at concerts, or even attending each other’s solo activities and school graduations, female idols constantly make grand gestures of support and love for one another. When tabloids attempted to pit the Wonder Girls and SNSD against each other in a battle for K-Pop dominance, the two groups repeatedly asserted their close friendship. And as Lee Hyori mentored SPICA, she taught them to play a game where each girl had to compliment herself, and if she couldn’t, she lost. These gestures of self-love and friendship lead female fans by example, showing how they can combat the constant messages from mass media that women should be insecure and fight one another for the attention of men. Like any public figures, female artists aren’t politically perfect, but many of them still send important messages.
It’s for these reasons—and many others I don’t have the space to explore—that female artists in K-Pop deserve your respect. Faced with a sexist global society that criticizes their every action or inaction, in addition to the forces of colorism and neo-colonialism, female artists are some of the most influential and lucrative players in modern K-Pop. And with progress continuing worldwide, the power of these artists, whether in the recording studio or in the conference room, will continue to grow.
OP's note:
The article doesn't cover everything but it's a good start for a discussion.
One thing that bugs me the most about k-pop is that sex sells (we all know that), lots of girl groups do sexy concepts (some willingly, others, not so much... which itself is an issue); but those same girl group are bashed and insulted for giving the audience what it wants: SEX. And it's not just k-pop it's entertainment in general. You're not relevant until you're "sexual" but then you're a "relevant slut". And considering how young some of the idol are, it is a real issue. On one hand they're asked to be "saint", but on the other hand they should be ready to "sin" to be popular.
Either way, I know the previous article was a bit of a mess, but I thought this could make for an interesting discussion.
moonrok, macheretaengoo's channel, 1theK (former LOEN MUSIC) , SMTOWN
no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 04:11 pm (UTC)I have noticed a real problematic desire for female idols and artists to fail in Kpop. Look at all the people who can't wait to dance on 2ne1's grave or even F(x)'s and they arguably have the most acclaimed music in Kpop. So why are we so ready to tear down viable female artists at the expense of propping up at times rather mediocre male artists. It's sad.
no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 05:24 pm (UTC)I also think there is a certain level of standards that comes with being a female in K-Pop. You can't be too sexy (or you're a slut or just selling yourself or "it's a shame she has to resort to these methods"), you can't be too cute (or you're annoying or fake). Ladies have to do everything "right", whatever that is...Granted there are a bunch of mediocre girls, too, that get propped up for being pretty (similarly to their cute male counterparts) and I think that sooooometimes it's because they fit into those standards. Sometimes not--sometimes people just really like their face or whatever--maybe they have a sparkling personality (and this could be said for some guys, too). Who knows. It does get sad, however, when you hear talk of a female idol not wanting a certain image but they get shafted with it anyway. Like, why you gots to put her in a box fo'?
But, at least, I feel, you see people call out guys, too--especially when it comes to things like colorism and talent and yes maybe some even do vehemently want them to fail, lol. But, I also think they avoid a bunch of the criticisms because they don't really get "sexy" or "cute" (think of the extreme in both cases) overall concepts unless it's like...one song. Girl groups tend to get one or the other and those that don't (that are not backed up by a big company?) are always on the verge of forever-nugudom, disbanding, or changing it up entirely, it seems, even when they are good. I wonder what would happen if a boy group does something more overtly sexual outside of fanservice for a concert? Has it happened? That's kind of a weird thing, too--sexual things a guy does is "fanservice" and for the fans so it's fine--but for ladies much of the time it's a "concept" and doesn't need to be this way *cue Drake singing in the background--"you're a good girl and you know it~"* even, sometimes, when it actually is fanservice. The only time it doesn't seem to get flack for the ladies is when it's more coquettish (like flirty and teasing, I mean). But, it doesn't seem like it can just be their thing or what they like to do.
But, it's hard to say...everyone has an opinion.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 04:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 05:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 04:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 04:26 pm (UTC)It's nothing feminist or female empowering about women singing songs written by men, women dancing half naked will NEVER help women no matter what the song is about or who wrote it.
The problem here is that these women are getting shamed for dancing sexy, they getting ''slutshamed'' and that's the problem, not whatever the songs are feminist or not..
no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 04:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 04:47 pm (UTC)I read it and I feel, somehow, it was poorly written. Not becuase of any grammar issues that sometimes plague editorials, but rather its goal almost seemed to be mentioning as many names, groups and companies as possible instead of showcase its point, something that I'm not 100% sure of by the end. Was it how boy groups get away with things? Or maybe how female artist are changing this image? I'm not sure, its not every specified, I think that would be the number one problem right there. It needs a thesis statement. Desperately. Then an outline, so it doesn't feel like its abruptly jumping from subject to subject. It give a bit of clue with 3rd paragraph of questions, but it never states what it will show after that. Instead, it choose to jump from that and point out issues that plague all kpop groups. I don't disagree with the problems listed, but if you want to talk those write an article on that. It out of place where its in this article, it was your third question, it likewise be your third point. Or in the least, state your thesis, then talk about how you want to tackle that point next. To be honest, it felt like was shoe horned in, so that author could showcase that he/she knows that the problem exist so nobody will insult him/her for not mentioning it.)
This isn't a first time that an article about, err, feminism in kpop and I still don't feel like I know anything I couldn't have figure out on my own. I live for the day when someone actually writes a very researched and presented about the difficult of being a girl group in Korea/if and what effect its having on Korea culture, how it has change or why it doesn't change. Its something that I'd be interest in talking about and getting a inside view. This one does bring up a couple good examples, but overall, it falls short. I give credit for the author for trying, though.
(Sometimes it makes me want to write an article, but I feel to write a great article, you really need to do research and that requires both speaking Korean and Korea's general opinions on such topic. I don't speak Korean in the least bit nor have I been to the country.)
no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 05:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 04:49 pm (UTC)While the pelvic thrusts and shirt-ripping of male groups like Big Bang and 2PM were lauded in the online K-Pop communities I frequented, “Genie” drew criticism for having a “simple” dance designed to show off SNSD’s legs. When “Oh!” came out six months later, the girls were suddenly “too infantile.” Instead of having fun, I spent most of my early fandom days on the defensive.
idg the point writer is making, it's valid criticism. genie's choreo is legendary but it's male gaze-y lbr. so is oh just in opposite direction. girl groups are pandering to man, just like boy groups are pandering to girls. that's why most girls find girls groups' concepts to be boring/too sexy/too cute. because they aren't made with girls as a target audience in mind.
the problem (not only in kpop, things are the same in jpop and american industry) is that people have huge expectations when it comes to girls. guys can be passable looking borderline on ugly but it's okay because he's funny. but girl? who cares if girl is talented/funny/hardworking if she isn't also gorgeous (ofc without ps).
no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 07:20 pm (UTC)I can't really express myself well in English but I agree with your comment haha.
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 04:56 pm (UTC)and as a miss a stan, maybe i just saw the song through my pink colored glasses, but i don't see how they shamed 'other' girls.
i do feel there is a bigger need for female songwriters, this is why i love kim eana so much, and love her collaboration with gain even more, because she doesn't simply write for her, but she talks with gain a lot and writes about their experiences.
it also bothers me how they see sexuality (especially of women) as something dirty, that makes you less of a person, it's so unhealthy, especially when they are the ones who push these concepts in the girls.
no subject
Date: 2014-07-09 12:30 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 04:56 pm (UTC)I learnt nothing new and I'm not even sure the writer knows anything about feminist theory, and even less about feminist theory applied to the kpop world (which could be a wonderful article if done right)
no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 04:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 05:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 05:24 pm (UTC)I can't argue that girl groups/female soloists are held to a different standard but girl this essay... naw...
no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 05:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 11:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 05:30 pm (UTC)what might seem old to some of us might be new for some - especially the younger fans - no harm keeping this topic in fandom consciousness. no need to disparage the author too much - I rather he/she want to take in advice and keep improving, rather than not want to attempt to tackle this. I mean... no one starts out as a good writer, or a sensible feminist critic. It's all learned over time, and while technical criticism is important, encouragement is as well. feminism is a topic that's always a minefield with so many people, I wish people can be more welcoming towards people who are still finding their way around the topic
i also felt the point about female role models is an interesting one. no one would claim snsd's videos to be ... in any way feminist, but what about the idols on variety shows / idols and their backstories? From the few clips I saw of them on Running Man, they seemed pretty capable of standing up for themselves and speaking their own mind. I respect them for having survived in the cutthroat kpop industry for so long, as well. Given that the usual perspective is to state that the kpop industry is sexist and patriarchal, that these women can be and are for some role models actually highlights how the blanket claim of patriarchy in kpop might not be an adequate or useful one.
also sexuality in kpop is pretty interesting. it might sound like a dumb question, but why does sex sell? because we're attracted to sex I guess. so... is there a 'right' way to sell sex? people usually cite ga-in as an example of how there is a 'right' way to sell sex, but most cases aren't that clear-cut. fiestar's one more is a pretty good case in point. it's about a lady asking for a threesome, cos her lover ain't satisfying her enough. is that... catering to a male fantasy or someone asking for a better sex life? idk what I'm trying to say. Maybe just that despite all the moral outrage, sex still sells...and debating why it does and how people deem 'right' and 'wrong' would be good avenues for discussion.
just random thoughts here
no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 05:33 pm (UTC)But one issue seems to be that there's less room for females to even really be themselves. The article mentions guy groups ripping shirts but truth is not all guys do that. TOP of BB and Kyuhyun of SJ are two popular male idols who are known for reluctance to show skin but still they can exist in groups that have very eager flashers in them and that's ok. There's room for both extremes.
It seems to me like girl groups have to be more uniform in that. They go by the concept sexy vs. cute and not by their individual personalities or preferences. There are some outliers like Amber but even she seems to be kinda caged into her predetermined ambiguous tomboy role. From an outsiders POV it seems like 2ne1 might be another but then again, the CEO is a master in branding so I can't really say for sure.
Anyway, I don't have any particular wisdom as to why that is but just something I've noticed.
no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 06:06 pm (UTC)Yup. True. Even in promos, with guy groups you might get a little profile with their interests and stuff but come to think of it I've never really seen that with girl groups?? You might get her age and name and role within the group but what's her fave color?? Hmmm
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 06:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 09:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 06:50 pm (UTC)I would say girl groups actually experiment with different sounds and concepts way more than male groups. Groups like f(x), 2NE1, T-ara, Afterschool, and maybe Wonder Girls/Girls Generation do a pretty good job at mixing thins up. (sorry to nugu groups who are more experimental, I don't know you)
no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 10:57 pm (UTC)and i wanted ot say that too like people say 'girls are only cute or sexy!!' but boys are only Suits or Hiphop or Aegyo and Pastels (for one single then back to suits/hiphop) and all the songs sounds more similar than what the girls are putting out (bc its more competitive for girls)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 07:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 11:22 pm (UTC)STOP! *snicker*
no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 07:16 pm (UTC)Truer words never spoken.
The article itself doesn't really explain much, though... just points out that there are problems and gives a few examples.
no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 07:25 pm (UTC)HOWEVER, i will give the writer some props for briefly bringing up the idea of intersectionality with re: to cultural appropriation/colorism and feminist imagery in kpop. I feel that those are issues that are so rarely discussed by not just the industry, but fans as well because so many would rather just brush it under the rug than admit that your oppa or unnie done goofed. case in point: GD's continually embarrassing soft thug posing/dressing and CL's the baddest female. (in these cases, i'm speaking about the general fandom reaction and not omona.)
no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 11:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 09:45 pm (UTC)Do a sexy concept: you'll be bashed.
And let's not forget 95% of the bashing is done girls themselves (who would do anything to see their precious Oppa shirtless and doing hip trust and crotch grab)
There's nothing wrong with being overly sexual or overly cute (yes I know these girls in kpop are forced to do what asked of them I meant in general) there's is no right or wrong because it doesn't fucking concern you what others want to do with their own life and their life style and fashion choice.
It sickens me that girls are ready to hate on each other at any given moment for the smallest things.
As for the article... it's a mess.
no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 10:51 pm (UTC)no one really cares about sunny hill or glam , even when they both have sugles that are incredibly pro-girl and seemingly vying for interest from female fans (princess and prince charming, party xxo ect)
no one cared about d-unit and they flopped into oblivion (RIP) because the concept for the comeback they had it betting on was something like 'what if they dressed more like boy groups and did choreo more like the boys do" which is obvi going to fail bc men want women to be girls that they can either put on a pedestal (for being virgins/children/innocent) or degrade thru their gaze
thats why as a girl fan i sort of feel a bit outside of these discussions. like ok female president, for example, had the '''feminist message''' but was decidedly unfeminist in execution (lying to yura about not filming below the waist and doing it anyway) but watching the video i liked it even if i wished they werent being made to do it against their will because it was fun and the message, even if its written by a dude and a bit meaningless overall - is fun. but if a guy said to me his faves were girls day id find it totally skeevy? idk
im trying to say that as a woman i cant find it in me to NOT love and support every girl group because of this exact thing this useless article is trying to say but especially the ones i think are struggling because they are too female focused or just not appealing enough to dudes. i under stand a lot of u are just like... uber straight and loving it and thats why we have so many more boy group stans then girl groups HOWEVER what im getting at is please consider adding some nugu girls to ur roster
no subject
Date: 2014-07-09 12:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 11:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-07-08 11:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:just gonna leave this here
Date: 2014-07-08 11:30 pm (UTC)and Boa's face is me @ the article
Re: just gonna leave this here
Date: 2014-07-09 12:07 am (UTC)Look at you trying when you aint even trying.
Re: just gonna leave this here
From:Re: just gonna leave this here
From:no subject
Date: 2014-07-09 12:44 am (UTC)The only problem I have with kpop is that they 'over-masculinize' the guys and 'over-femininize' the girls. Like male groups all dance in a certain way (hip hop), dress in certain way (large t-shirts whatever). Even when some of the boys don't have the personality for it.... it just looks weird to me. And for the girls, sometimes I like watching them but most of the time it's just really really hard for me to relate to them. Like the miss a song mentioned in the article..... it's a good message (I think), but then their execution is still girls being typically girly. I'm just kind of tired of that orz (especially since that's not how I act). I do wonder if it's just all an act anyways, but then I feel like it's detrimental to society cuz it's leading young boys and girls to believe that's how they 'should' act?
no subject
Date: 2014-07-09 11:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From: